CV 40f1.4 or Canon 35f2 ?

[FrankS]

Aside from the focal length and max. f-stop differences, how would these 2 lenses compare against each other in image characteristics? Thanks for your opinions!

 

[back alley]

the canon has funnier bokeh...and a softer/smoother look to the images...it produces a more 'classic' look to it's images...

the cv is sharper, more modern images...sometimes more funky bokeh...

 

[FrankS]

So, funny vs funky bokeh?

😉

If you were to choose one, which one would it be, and why?

 

[Nokton48]

The Canon 35mm F2 is a great lens. I've heard it called the "Summicron Killer" and that is not inappropriate, in my experence with owning both lenses. If you like the older retro look, you should not be unhappy with the Canon F2.

I only sold mine because I got the 35mm F1.5 and didn't need both lenses at the time. Now I find myself missing it.

 

[Bingley]

Based on the photos I've seen taken with these lenses (I haven't owned either of them), I'd opt for the CV 40/1.4 as between the two. I've seen some gorgeous color photos, particularly from the single-coated version of the CV. The closer focusing ability and extra stop in speed could also come in handy.

That said, I own a lovely Canon 35/1.8, an older design than the f.2 version, which exhibits no swirly or funky bokeh, although it's probably softer wide open and at f.2 than the later Canon. I think it's a terrific optic and good value, but not the Canon 35 you've asked about.

 

[back alley]

So, funny vs funky bokeh?

😉

If you were to choose one, which one would it be, and why?

i would pick the cv...because i decided a long time ago to stay with the modern look from newer lenses...i prefer my lenses with less character so i can infuse an image with more of my character.

 

[FrankS]

For modern lenses, I rely on my Nikon SLR's.

I look for vintage character from my RF gear.

You have plenty of character without needing vintage gear, Joe.

 

[Krosya]

Had both. Both are very nice with their own qualities. Kept CV due to closer focus and better flare control, plus I have a couple other 35mm lenses, one of which is a Komura 35/2.8 - a great lens that gives a less modern look, so it's a fair substitute.
I also prefer look of the images I got from CV 40. Not sure how to explain this, - just a personal feeling I guess. For a fast small lens - CV 40/1.4 is very hard to beat IMO.

 

[sevres_babylone]

Frank, I have the CV40 S.C. I don't know the Canon, so can't help in a comparison.
In a comparison with the CV35 2.5, which I'd say has a very modern look, I'd say the 40mm is more vintage-looking. I know it's not the most generous offer, but if you're coming into the city, you're welcome to borrow mine for an afternoon.

I have number of pictures taken with it on the R-D1 on flickr (60mm equivalent) that might give you some idea of how it renders colour and how the out of focus areas look:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=50684955@N00&q=40mm

 

[FrankS]

Frank, I have the CV40 S.C. I don't know the Canon, so can't help in a comparison.
In a comparison with the CV35 2.5, which I'd say has a very modern look, I'd say the 40mm is more vintage-looking. I know it's not the most generous offer, but if you're coming into the city, you're welcome to borrow mine for an afternoon.

I have number of pictures taken with it on the R-D1 on flickr (60mm equivalent) that might give you some idea of how it renders colour and how the out of focus areas look:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=50684955@N00&q=40mm

Thanks buddy. I have a MC 40 Nokton, and am thinking about a Canon 35f2.

 

[ferider]

I had the Canon, Frank, and sold it - bokeh can be really distracting sometimes, and the lens doesn't feel particularly well built.

I have and keep a 40 Nokton as my most modern, "cleanest" normal. Image quality is really outstanding, in all technical aspects. And it's well built and handling feels just right.

After trying many lenses handling qualities have become increasingly important for me; and the fact that it's impossible to put a modern red or yellow filter on the Canon also bothers me.

Roland.

 

[jsrockit]

If for digital, use the Canon. If for film get the Nokton.

 

[FrankS]

Thanks Roland, I was hoping to hear your view on this, given your experience with many lenses.

I have the opportunity to buy this Canon lens, good/decent condition, sell my Summaron 35f3.5, and come out even in the switch. Would you do this? (Roland or anyone)

 

[fbf]

I would do it, simply for the speed. I think canon 35/2 is a great lens, especially for the price and size.
I agree with Roland that 40/1.4 is a better lens all around. It comes down to what you shoot and how you shoot. I can live with either lens.

 

[FrankS]

Since I can't afford a Summicron 35 ...

 

[jsrockit]

I have the opportunity to buy this Canon lens, good/decent condition, sell my Summaron 35f3.5, and come out even in the switch.

Without a doubt.