CV15 f/4.5 on ZM Ikon - vignetting?

akiralx

Established
Local time
4:24 AM
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
148
Location
Melbourne, VIC
I'm inferring from these that using the CV 15mm on the Ikon is not a good idea... though Zeiss have a similar lens in their lineup?
 

Attachments

  • 549145198_wNtXM-L.jpg
    549145198_wNtXM-L.jpg
    42.1 KB · Views: 0
  • 549145200_Rar8K-L.jpg
    549145200_Rar8K-L.jpg
    32.9 KB · Views: 0
No, just the shallow CV hood, though with a UV/IR filter attached (for M8 use) held in place by a rubber O ring.

I suspect the problem may be I stopped down too far - to at least f/11 if I recall?
 
^ Or something wrong with the lens. Shouldn't matter, the aperture.

The lens was fine on the rest of the trip with the M8 - the filter can't really be easily removed so I'll just not use it with the ZM.

My main issue with these Fuji Acros 100 shots from Switzerland is that once again Ilford's scans seem to have massive contrast, despite my asking them not to do any PP with the scans. I'll get some prints to check.

549148973_jFyos-L.jpg
 
Last edited:
that is your filter, on the m8 you dont see it because of 1.3x crop where the filter is just outside of your pictures, then when on a "full frame" body it will show up, no mystery here.
 
that is your filter, on the m8 you dont see it because of 1.3x crop where the filter is just outside of your pictures, then when on a "full frame" body it will show up, no mystery here.

Thanks all.

Yes, this must be the reason. I only took these two shots with this combination so no real disaster.

I think it's a B+W filter, it needs to be held in with an O ring as no other way, a common method when used with the M8 as obviously it needs a UV/IR filter with that body.

I have it coded as a Leica WATE via the adaptor, which is milled with pits. It did perform well with the M8:

542395982_iTGfa-XL-1.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom