Dead Fly in Lens Won’t Have Much Effect on Image Quality

Lenses are funny. I used to take head shots of chickens in Hawaii through chain fencing. If you put the lens up to the fence w/ the aperture wide open, it would actually focus PAST the fencing that was running right across the front optic's field of view. I mean, the fencing would disappear in the SLR's viewfinder when focusing on the curious chicken, and it wasn't there on the negs either.
 
A fly in a lens? Well, I never...! Bugs in cameras, yes. Don't get me going on my new Nikon Z6...

You should put the lens on Ebay with a humungusly high BIN price. Say "rare" and "collectable" (you can spell the latter as "collectible" for greater impact, or as "collect-able" for the more clueless Ebay browsers to figure out) and clean up big time.

If it's a Nikon 58mm 1.4 nine-bladed S from circa 1960, you could name your price and treat yourself to a gala round-the-world photo shoot on the sale.

On a more serious (seriouser) vein, I was at my camera repair shop this morning and asked my service man about lens bugs. His reply: not to bother if shooting at fairly wide (f/4-f/5.6) apertures. The cost of dismantling/cleaning/reassembling the lens is also a factor, he went on to say. Do a test and see what the results show.

The very savage chicken post had him (almost) rolling on the floor, however. Good one, that.
 
I had a Minolta lens with a bug in it.

IMG_5586.JPG


Other than turning everyone's portraits into Spiderman, there was no other visible effect on the pictures. Some sort of early snapchat filter or something.
 
Back
Top Bottom