kbg32
neo-romanticist
Keith,
Just curious: eye, nose or teeth?
Cal
Side of the head around the left temple. I'm a righty.
Keith,
Just curious: eye, nose or teeth?
Cal
Side of the head around the left temple. I'm a righty.
Keith,
A nasty blow. Did he go down?
Cal
I twice worked at National labs, and one of the work requirements was steel toe shoes. Definately great weapons you can wear in plain sight. They would give me a chit for $100.00 to buy steel toes. Had a pair of steel toed cowboy boots, they even sold steel toed dress shoes to wear with a suit.
If you get a chance look up "Liver Punch." An easy way to end any fight. Worse than getting kicked in the jewels. Will stop any sized man.
Best way of course is to avoid any fight at all costs, but if you have to make sure you take the guy out decisively. Long fights are not in one's favor.
Cal
No, unfortunately. But he yelped liked a small dog and staggered off. I didn't stick around much longer. It was a few years ago. The nastiest incident I ever had. He grabbed me and then started to get very rough. Accused me of photographing him when I didn't. He was one of those people that sell counterfeit goods. Second time I've had a run in with those guys.
Yeah, I had a pair of steel toed dress shoes-bought because they were $25 in the catalog and non-steel toed were $55 ! LOL!
He was one of those people that sell counterfeit goods. Second time I've had a run in with those guys. I stayed away from that area for awhile. Canal, just east of West Broadway.
J,
I generally wear combat/construction boots most of the time when shooting, otherwise I'm wearing sneakers. With heavy boots I'm wearing weapons in plain sight, and flip-flops project vulnerability. I too often shoot with wides, but at least I'm prepared for the worse.
Also if someone grabbed me I know what I would do to defend myself which would of been kinda automatic. I think a more ready posture would of prevented the confrontation because you exposed yourself and promoted vulnerability.
You also have to understand that you did invade his space by getting in close and by using a 21. Might I suggest that a 28 is still wide, but safer. All I'm saying is that you kinda got in his face, and what do you expect? If you are a street shooter you have to be prepared for the worse and know how to respond to other people's aggression.
Cal
Good advice. I happened to have the wrong mixture of things going on then. You live and you learn.
And I agree, I got in his face with a 21mm and he reacted, if you engage in this kind of behavior with different people, you're bound to have bad encounters.
What I do differently now is to only shoot street when I go out specifically for it. This is opposed to doing it "on the fly" or on the way to the office. I wear sneakers and rarely get into peoples space.
Overall, I refuse to allow the experience make me afraid of the street, or slow down with photography. I'll never want to stop wandering around. It's just too amazing of a world out there.
When I was actually trying to make a living shooting what now seems to be called "street" for social change mags and the like (who sent out want lists for article) I used a [permanently] borrowed Leica 21 a lot. I found if I moved just close enough and paid attention to the background I could shoot quite well with it.
Photos looked quite natural, if I was careful, not much different than a 28, and one could really work in tight, literally right on top of people. I personally have never had problems with close shots, especially in NYC it has always been someone in the background or not even in my photos who has gone ballistic - 90% male street denizens. But I have found in most cases compensation and a friendly attitude has worked.
In NYC anything could happen. BTW I was evacuated from work due to an airplane crashing into a highrise on 72d Street. The pilot was a Yankee pitcher. Definately had an AP photo opportunity, but no camera.
Cal