bmattock
Veteran
My apologies if this has already been posted - I did a search and did not see it anywhere.
http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/5020/camera-review-diana.html
http://www.lomography.com/diana/diana-camera
I had a Diana as a kid. It was fun. It would be interesting to try one again, but I didn't want to pay those crazy insane eBay prices for a toy camera. Part of the joy of toy cameras is that they are dead cheap, I think.
http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/5020/camera-review-diana.html
http://www.lomography.com/diana/diana-camera
I had a Diana as a kid. It was fun. It would be interesting to try one again, but I didn't want to pay those crazy insane eBay prices for a toy camera. Part of the joy of toy cameras is that they are dead cheap, I think.
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
the new toy is going for 50 dollars.
the originals can be found in flea markets and garage sales for 3 to 5 dollars.
the originals can be found in flea markets and garage sales for 3 to 5 dollars.
bmattock
Veteran
Could be - but I have also seen them on eBay for upward of $75. Even $50 is more than I wanted to spend, really. Oh well.
David Murphy
Veteran
Yes they've been back in production for a couple of months now or so (as I recall). ANY film camera that makes a comeback is welcome news for sure -- even one as eccentric as this!
mtbbrian
RF's ROCK!andFilm RULES!!
Yes and no would be a better answer.
I mean yes it's a Diana, but it's only a reporoduction.
There are some distint differences, the new one can switch to a pin hole camera, where the original would didn't.
I have heard some say that the lens characteristics aren't the same as the original Diana too.
Brian
I mean yes it's a Diana, but it's only a reporoduction.
There are some distint differences, the new one can switch to a pin hole camera, where the original would didn't.
I have heard some say that the lens characteristics aren't the same as the original Diana too.
Brian
bmattock
Veteran
Yes, I can well imagine that level of crappiness would be hard to reproduce on purpose - but perhaps it is crappy in a new and exciting different way! Anyway, I guess I'd only go a couple sawbucks on the thing, tops. As far as seeing them in thrift shops - sadly no. I have frequented many such shops looking for old audio gear - I see many Time-Life 35mm cameras, and lots of gummy Polaroid Swingers, but no Dianas or their cousins.
sooner
Well-known
Another definition of toy camera is one you want to give your kids to get them started in photography. I agree that in any case they should be cheap, i.e. not expensive. I probably paid close to $100 last year for a Pentax 110 setup, which I gave my son as a "spy camera" after seeing one in the newish Spy Museum in Washington DC. But I'm thinking one of these Diana's would be a cool next step.
sepiareverb
genius and moron
The Holgas are probably quite similar to this Diana, and only $30US. The Holgas rarely leak, and the lens is often much better than the old Diana.
I see images from a collection of 8 recent Holgas of various versions- I lend them out to students all the time. They're no Diana, but quite fun and sorta crappy in their own way.
I see images from a collection of 8 recent Holgas of various versions- I lend them out to students all the time. They're no Diana, but quite fun and sorta crappy in their own way.
sooner
Well-known
I forgot to mention, it's nice to see you back on the forum, Bill M.
R
RML
Guest
Toy cameras are great fun... if you are into this kind of low level technology. 
I'm more inclined to digital and thus(?) got me a Minox Leica M3. Really.
http://shardsofphotography.blogspot.com/search?q=Minox+Leica+M3
Now I'm thinking I could even better have spent the 250+ euro on a Barbie doll set with Barbie camera, or one of them bog, luvvable digital baby toy cameras you see in the toy store these days. Hey, it'll be crap, just like the Holga or Diana.
I'm more inclined to digital and thus(?) got me a Minox Leica M3. Really.
http://shardsofphotography.blogspot.com/search?q=Minox+Leica+M3
Now I'm thinking I could even better have spent the 250+ euro on a Barbie doll set with Barbie camera, or one of them bog, luvvable digital baby toy cameras you see in the toy store these days. Hey, it'll be crap, just like the Holga or Diana.
bmattock
Veteran
RML said:Toy cameras are great fun... if you are into this kind of low level technology.
I'm more inclined to digital and thus(?) got me a Minox Leica M3. Really.
http://shardsofphotography.blogspot.com/search?q=Minox+Leica+M3
Now I'm thinking I could even better have spent the 250+ euro on a Barbie doll set with Barbie camera, or one of them bog, luvvable digital baby toy cameras you see in the toy store these days. Hey, it'll be crap, just like the Holga or Diana.![]()
I'm sorry to hear that. I had seen this camera - and the not-really Rollieflex as well, and thought they were neat - but out of my price range entirely. Well, thank you for taking one for the team - and yes, that camera is cute.
bmattock
Veteran
sooner said:I forgot to mention, it's nice to see you back on the forum, Bill M.
Thank you. We'll see how long I can hold my bitterness at bay.
R
RML
Guest
bmattock said:Thank you. We'll see how long I can hold my bitterness at bay.
You're doing great, Bill.
And don't forget, beer is bitter too.
iamzip
Ambitious, but rubbish
I agree with sepia, if you really want to try a toy camera, you can get a Holga with a hot shoe for about $25, and one with a built in flash for $36. It's a fun little camera, and it got me back into film photography.
bmattock
Veteran
I never left the film photography, and I had a Diana when they were new. Just memories is all - I really don't want a Holga, I want a Diana. But not for $50. Sadly.
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
I got my Diana camera back in 1979, I found her on a park bench, kinda muddy but nothing that a garden hose and a clean rag could not fix.
they do give a dreamy look to the photographs.
that low tech plastic lens is very sweet.
they do give a dreamy look to the photographs.
that low tech plastic lens is very sweet.
mtbbrian
RF's ROCK!andFilm RULES!!
xayraa33 said:I got my Diana camera back in 1979, I found her on a park bench, kinda muddy but nothing that a garden hose and a clean rag could not fix.
they do give a dreamy look to the photographs.
that low tech plastic lens is very sweet.
What a serendipitous way to find such a serendipitous camera!
Brian
sepiareverb
genius and moron
Perhaps some 0000 steel wool on the Holga lens and then some blue paint?
Just kidding- I know what you mean. I love my Diana, layers of tape residue and all. That lens is what they are all about, and that's what the Holgas can't touch.
Just kidding- I know what you mean. I love my Diana, layers of tape residue and all. That lens is what they are all about, and that's what the Holgas can't touch.
rbiemer
Unabashed Amateur
Save most of that 250 euro and look here:
http://www.shopgoodwill.com/viewItem.asp?ItemID=3339792
I should note the seller will ship only to US and Canada. I'll help out with that if you need me to.
Rob
http://www.shopgoodwill.com/viewItem.asp?ItemID=3339792
Rob
RML said:Now I'm thinking I could even better have spent the 250+ euro on a Barbie doll set with Barbie camera, or one of them bog, luvvable digital baby toy cameras you see in the toy store these days. Hey, it'll be crap, just like the Holga or Diana.![]()
R
RML
Guest
rbiemer said:Save most of that 250 euro and look here:
http://www.shopgoodwill.com/viewItem.asp?ItemID=3339792
I should note the seller will ship only to US and Canada. I'll help out with that if you need me to.
Rob
Rob, I'll pass.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.