Did I buy a fake Contax II?

Ash

Selflessly Self-involved
Local time
9:33 AM
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
3,238
Right here's the images from the auction I decided to burn my money on. The cheque sent, but I guess I could risk the £20 charge to cancel it, or else go through ebay buyer protection once the camera is in my hands.

What looks like a Flash Sync is really throwing me here, but the seller also has a G1 or G2 up for sale, so I kinda had faith he bought a real II in the first place. That, and I've never seen a fake with Zeiss bumps!


Maybe I'm getting overly worried thanks to Scherer's "beware the fake Contax" stuff on his site!!



Course I'll only know then the camera arrives and I can use and inspect it.
Any thoughts? Anyone good enough to decipher what Contax II this is (ie production run) from the images??

Zeiss Ikon Contax 11 with carl zeiss jena 5cm f2 lens. Good working order, shutter working at all speeds, shows signs of use but not abuse. overall is very nice. Body and back seriel numbers match. Lens has cleaning marks on front element, however i have used worse and not noticed any adverse effects. self timer working. Has been syncronised for flash on the front of the camera, making it an excellent user camera. Please ask any questions.
 

Attachments

  • 48_1.JPG
    48_1.JPG
    20.4 KB · Views: 2
  • 88_1.JPG
    88_1.JPG
    21.4 KB · Views: 2
  • b0_1.JPG
    b0_1.JPG
    21.3 KB · Views: 2
  • cf_1.JPG
    cf_1.JPG
    21 KB · Views: 2
  • cf_2.JPG
    cf_2.JPG
    22.7 KB · Views: 2
Ash, I have just compared your pics to one of my Contax IIs, and aside from the funky-looking flash sync, everything appears to be as it should. It's an export model, based on the Made in Germany engraved on the rewind knob. It does not exhibit the most common tell-tale signs of a fake, such as the lack of raised edge on the film counter, flat bails around the bottom locking knobs, or simplified engraving such as no or minimal feathers on the rewind knob arrow.

Looks legit to me.
 
Thanks for the confirmation :)

I'm hoping that flash sync was a factory mod, but either way I have a Contax on the way :D

Did I tell you I saw a Contax I in the science/optics museum in Oxford?? I felt so upset it was being wasted on display, when I could be out taking photo's with it! (yes, your photo of yours planted a huge seed)
 
Ash, send your camera to me and I will be glad to do an in-depth examination, field testing et cetera. Shouldn't take more than a year or two :)

Oh, remember to includes lots of film in the package.
 
I had to Google Aria Giovanni because I had no idea who she was. I see that she's an actress, or something.
 
dexdog said:
...or something.

I think the "or something" is right from what I saw... Not a big movie guy, but I hadn't heard of her either. Maybe she's more popular for her still work ;)

Glad your contax was given the ok Ash...

Peter
 
I wouldn´t say it´s a fake.
Everything seems to show the real thing.
Some Contax IIs had flash synch added at a later date either factory mods, or done by external shops. It means that the shop placed the PC connector in any suitable place, close to the place where the Kievs had the connector.
I´ve got one with the PC connector clearly added after she left the factory in 1937, and is located right (seen fron the front of the camera) of the lens and in mid way between the front chrome panel and the removable camera back/bottom. It´s usually located under the metal sheet that holds the supply reel in position.
Kievs have it located close to the inner right corner of the front plate.
Besides, the two metal feet (where the locks are) is finely ribbed. Kievs have it coarser.
Another thing that shows that it can be a real Contax is that some of them had their S/N marked in different places, but allways the body and back numbers (a letter telling production year and some digits telling production number) must match. Mine has S/N marked in the acces. shoe, the back and the body. Many cameras don´t have any numbering visible from the outside.

Hope this helps

Ernesto
 
I bought one several months ago, and also got the same vibes you're getting. When I received it, several things made me very suspect to it.. the grinding, non-smooth advance; irregular frame spacing; non-straight frames; strange sounding shutter; and the fact that I couldn't unscrew the back (the screws were glued in). The seller apparently performed a full CLA on this, and I was expecting a much, MUCH smoother camera without the previous issues, and just had my suspicions that the insides were not contax. I don't care that it was a 70 year old camera, with a full CLA, these things should have been addressed. The seller listened me out, and I was fortunate that he was good on taking a return and refunding my money. The lens on the other hand.. my god what a wonderful piece of work. Even with the new ZM sonnar, I miss it, and wish I could've kept it :)

Jano
 
So Ash, we made you do it :)

To me that flash socket alone is a certain sign of authencity. It devalues a camera, so you'd unlikely see it on a fake, unless it was made from a later synched Kiev and scammer was too lazy to remove it. But then, the PC socket would've been located in the "proper" place.
 
Phys,

I concur, that one is certainly a fake. According to several books I have read, CZJ made only 5 of these cameras as a marketing test. This camera exhibits many hallmarks of a fake.
 
Back
Top Bottom