digitally confused....

copake_ham said:
Wait a minute! Honus Wagner played for the PITTSBURGH PIRATES!!!!

Either you change your team or you change your name! 😀

He also played for the Louisville Colonels. At least I stayed in the National League. 😛

Also, who was it that called Honus the greatest baseball player he had ever seen? None other than the great John McGraw of the GIANTS.


anaanda - sorry for highjacking your thread. I can relate to your story, however. I do give digital photography credit for rekinding my interest in photography. After a while, though, I missed the analog experience. For now, I am really enjoying using a rangefinder camera and film. Also, the Dodgers still suck 😀

Robert
 
Honus said:
He also played for the Louisville Colonels. At least I stayed in the National League. 😛

Also, who was it that called Honus the greatest baseball player he had ever seen? None other than the great John McGraw of the GIANTS.


anaanda - sorry for highjacking your thread. I can relate to your story, however. I do give digital photography credit for rekinding my interest in photography. After a while, though, I missed the analog experience. For now, I am really enjoying using a rangefinder camera and film. Also, the Dodgers still suck 😀

Robert


Now I could say something nasty like why do they call them GIANTS.

Perhaps from visiting Balcor and "bulking up"? 😀

[Before the "evil one" named O'Malley took 'dem Bums west I was a DODGERS fan!] 😛
 
copake_ham said:
Now I could say something nasty like why do they call them GIANTS.

Perhaps from visiting Balcor and "bulking up"? 😀

OK, fair enough. Of course, I could also bring up Jason Giambi. 😱

copake_ham said:
Before the "evil one" named O'Malley took 'dem Bums west I was a Dodgers fan! 😛

I can excuse just about any human weakness, but you are now stretching the limits of human tolerance. The Yankees are one thing, but dem Bums are another . :bang:

Robert
 
You know, that I route for the Red Sox and ANYONE else playing against the Yankees. 🙂 Well, except for my new home team which is hopeless (Diamondbacks).

Ray
 
I feel the same with my Eos 300D. However, I get the real rf feeling from shooting my R-D1. A bit pricey, I know, but hey, the feeling's worth it! 🙂
 
anaanda said:
To make a long story short..I recently got back into photography after my soon to be wife decided we should get a really nice digital camera. I was all excited ..did my research..and for price and value... decided on D70s Nikon. Started shooting and then it hit me. I don't like this process! All these choices!...multiple menus...white balance three types of exposure, image size, quality, raw, jpeg.. multiple ways of autofocusing ...all these different modes etc....finally I said the hell with it and just put it on auto. (which is quite boring)..( I still haven't mastered the different ways to use this camera)...

After remembering my days with a contax G1 in the mid nineties, I started on my rangefinder quest and have happily ended up with an Xpan, a Canonet and a Yashica GT. Now I can choose different films, developers, papers. print digitally or traditionally in the darkroom. And the best thing is that I always have a negative to go back to!!

Its not just about the image.... its about the process that brought you there as well...If you enjoyed the process it will show in your photograph....Now I relax and enjoy the simplicity of film and rangefinder photography....... and beauty I might add...

anybody feel the same?

quite. Very much the same. I made a brief digi-jaunt, only to return passionately to film. I don't care that the D200 will produce images with as much resolution as a 35mm neg scanned. Or that it is smoother or grainless. It's fake. Like fake breasts, it might look good at first glance, but at closer inspection, there's nothing real there. Only a faint memory of life.

Today, my mother handed me a newspaper article - an entire section, really, about these photographers' pictures nad what they did to get the images. My first reaction, and without any processing or hesitation, was "Digital bastards!" - and that was that. I laugh about it now because of how naturally that exclamation came forth, and how well it resonates here on RFF.
 
Last edited:
shutterflower said:
My first reaction, and without any processing or hesitation, was "Digital bastards!" - and that was that. I laugh about it now because of how naturally that exclamation came forth, and how well it resonates here on RFF.

Say what?! 😛
 
RML said:
Say what?! 😛


nothing personal. That was just my first reaction. MY reaction. Very much an opinion. I wasn't considering your inital post when I wrote that.

Honestly, to every photographer, their own. I guess that fact that beside that ad was an ad for a bunch of point'n'shoot digicams being sold by the local retailer that is currently running all their film stock out of hte store. . . that just came together and made my yell.

😀
 
Last edited:
copake_ham said:
No way dude,

Keep it open if you don't wanna get "hurt"....

Manhattan Man

😀
Oh, George... promises, promises.

Thanks for understanding that I had my "tongue-in-cheek"... I was rushing and forgot to put in the " 😉 ", " 🙂 ", or (just for you)... " 😛 ".
 
BrianShaw said:
Oh, George... promises, promises.

Thanks for understanding that I had my "tongue-in-cheek"... I was rushing and forgot to put in the " 😉 ", " 🙂 ", or (just for you)... " 😛 ".

No problem - it was all good fun "banter" - kind of like a "virtual pub" complete with "trash talkin'"! 😀
 
Sparrow said:
So refreshing to read a film vs. digital thread with a happy ending, thanks, almost 6:00 here so time for an actual beer I think 🙂

Have a pint for me - I've a number of hours to go yet.... :bang:
 
Agree... went full circle on the digital thing. Sad to see so many of the old film companies failing, like Minolta, and others going through some rough times, like Leica. My conclusion is digital isn't "all that". I enjoy the film process, making my own B&W prints in a darkroom, the cameras. My digital has a 12x optical zoom. I use it in place of a big-zoom lens. For everything else - film.
 
Back
Top Bottom