This one is terrific also. Interesting, early in the interview, he mentions discussion with other photographers in his early career as a photographer. What impresses me in all of his interviews is his very deft intellect and his eloquence in examining the morality and the psychology of his war photography, and then his very deliberate and detailed exposition of what it is in the landscape that he is looking for in his later pictures. All of this without much in the way of formal education. He must have been a great talker as a kid and his parents must have encouraged him in conversations and he was likely a charming and likeable young man and all of that formed his intellect in the field as it were, seemingly needing little in the way of formal instruction or extensive reading—which presumably later he may have done.