Don't flaunt your vintage camera on the plane!

I suspect there's a "Karen" involved....

They are saying on "another network" that it was a Canon F1.

300px-Canon_F-1_%2813746363604%29.jpg


I would think that anyone with half of a brain (an idiot who is studying to be a moron, perhaps?) would easily recognize the device above as a common camera and not as a Weapon Of Mass Destruction (tm).

This is SCARY, since I've shot out of plane windows with a Pentax MX, which a naive observer probably could not tell apart from the Canon F1 on a police line-up!

Just the thought of me being arrested and spread out on the runway as two goons hold me down is VERY disconcerting!
 
This is beyond stupid. I have never been more ashamed to be an American than right now. My wife and I considered a move to Canada, but they got wise to this around 2017.
I do hope this poor photographer can find good lawyers and educate the idiot who did this. The Karen owes him big time. The airline owes him big time. The security apparatus owes him very big time. I would shoot for at least 6 zeros. Even the young people, such as my son's friends, have watched movies and TV shows -- and know what a camera is. It takes a phenomenally stupid person to have done what was reported here....and yet more stupid people to make it much worse. I would quote the great movie "Spaceballs" here, but need to keep it clean.

I once attended a federal training about terrorism (actually more than once). I couldn't believe it when they repeated the myth about "cameras" such as DSLRs. Then proceded to explain to us how cell phones are the preferred tool most criminals use to recon vulnerabilities. Why? Because they are discreet and the images can be instantly shared to remote locations and even real-time analyses by remote criminals; and real-time communication with the person on the ground to direct what is photographed (and stored digitally in remote location). This makes it better for the criminal (terrorist) enterprise because if the person on the ground with cell phone is actually suspected and detained (unlikely), the images and their usefulness are already in the hands of the enterprise. Yet, a person with a large camera that takes film is much more dangerous -- everyone knows film is the preferred medium for scoping out potential targets. Right? This digital instant cloud sharing stuff is so....unprofessional.

I have been approached and questioned while photographing the historic post office in my town, with a Rolleiflex. The suspicion was thick from the moment she saw me and terrorist was the clear assumption. I feel so.....powerfully dangerous now. Watch out, I might take your portrait and have a print in....a week or so.

More recently, airport security held my Leica in the xray machine for about 20 minutes using the new 360 view to inspect, inspect, and inspect. After the 5th or 6th security genious arrived, it seemed all was OK and the belt moved on. I do hope they didn't damage my camera! That's a long time to sit under xrays. And, there's likely no recourse for damages. I was told that while you are in the "no man's land" of airport security, there is no liability for damages caused by security. Maybe someone here with a genuine legal education can elucidate or debunk that. Almost made me late for my flight and held up an already long line behind us.
 
Yikes..I am so not looking forward to flying back into the country in 5 weeks, I have gear in backpack, satchel and even in my check in. It was not issue flying out three weeks ago.

That poor guy, I would be utterly mortified.
 
This very easily coulda been me, since I've been known to shoot out the window with a vintage camera when in flight! Or, could have been just about anyone on here. Maybe it was?

Surf here: https://petapixel.com/2021/10/11/man...gency-landing/

There is no accounting for stupid. I do not mean the camera owner, I mean the panicked fellow traveller. Some people are so effing dumb. Honest to God, most species are supposed to be evolving to a higher state. Why is it that humans seem to be evolving backwards into an amoeba like state - except for their sense of self regard and self importance that is, which is on an ever upward trajectory fueled by schools which fail to teach anything and the internet which reinforces the unfounded sense of self importance. Was it Einstein who said "Only two things are infinite: The universe and human stupidity. And I am not sure about the universe".
My guess is that its all down to the Dunning-Kruger Effect. Sadly though there are more and more of these around us every day.
For those not in the know......................... Dunning–Kruger effect - Wikipedia
 
I've carried many cameras (vintage 1960-ish to current) through TSA checkpoints and never been questioned about them.

The only item I was ever questioned about was when I made the mistake of packing a full-size electric toothbrush a number of years ago. (Use your imagination as to what that might look like to a scanner operator.) {blush}

However, at least for a while, I'm gonna avoid pulling out a camera and casually shooting out the plane window!
 
I can't blame the fellow passenger for being ignorant and scared. Some people just are. But why the hell was this situation allowed to escalate to the level it did? I blame all those who allowed one person's ignorant fears to override their own rationality: the flight attendants, the pilots, the other passengers, and the security (fear) apparatus. No one here was using their full brain.
 
I feel so sorry for the photographer. Poor guy. What an experience. If the camera was indeed a Canon F1 that's remarkable, my first thought it might've been a Barnack or a folder which might not be so familiar to people. But an SLR? I guess this is a good example of "framing"... where the first label ("bomb") used to describe an object or incident frames the perceptions and actions that follow. I blame it on the decline of teaching critical thinking in schools, and the dog-whistling employed by the political class. I hope the photographer sues for damages and compensation, but I don't think that will affect future responses. It may take generations to undo the decline in education and public discourse.
 
It sounds like an incredible story to me. If it really happened as told it's pretty scary. The most unbelivieble thing is that it only takes one person saying "hey, that one has a B..." to make this happen. We live in a difficult, complicated, hysterical world.
Holding the person involved for hours in a world of instant communication is another point to clarify. It should not have been difficult for the authorities to verify in a short time.
Curious to know if anyone will pay for this...
 
Back
Top Bottom