DSLR less obvious than Rangefinder these days?

True, but, like NYC or DC, SF is not exactly representative of the U.S. or the rest of the world (e.g., I doubt that there are many places w/a wet plate photo studio like Photobooth in the Mission).

The (almost all) men I encounter who recognize Leicas tend to fall into the following 4 groups (though obviously some people fall into more than 1), in descending order of frequency:

(1) Nostalgists, usually Baby Boomer & older photo nerds, typically someone who used to shoot w/them "back in the day" but now uses a dSLR or mirrorless w/autofocus "because their eyes are going." I put guys who remember their fathers or grandfathers using a Leica in this group, too.
(2) Spec-oriented photo nerds, often middle-aged dentists/doctors/lawyers/tech businessmen, who shoot w/them now because "they're the best." I guess these are the dudes buying the new 50mm APO.
(3) Art school photo nerds (college age & up). These are the guys who often have an arts background like your SF folks, but design web sites or whatever to pay the bills. If they have a good paying job & own 1, they're more likely to talk about being inspired by [fill in the blank famous photographer who used a Leica] & how a Leica "is an extension of my hand."
(4) Working photojournalists & professional photographers who recognize & respect an iconic tool. They're always complaining that Leicas are too expensive to be used by "real photographers" anymore.

PKR said:
Lots of what you call "photo nurds" in SF.
Click to expand...

Sadly, that's true of most of the country & also goes for car models, sports teams, reality shows, etc.

PKR said:
I think the general public knows more about camera models than they do about the folks running their local government.
Click to expand...
 
Roger Hicks said:
Welcome, and of course you are absolutely right. But some people have difficulty in acting naturally, even when they are there 'for something'. Others have bought into a ridiculous 'stealth' fantasy. Perhaps I might rephrase your exhortation as "Act the way you feel -- and if you don't feel confident you're there for a good reason, ask yourself why not."

Cheers,

R.
Click to expand...

The urge to go and photograph should come from a creative drive, not the need to go out and play the street photographer because its the cool thing to do. People who lack confidence also lack creativity and hence its better for them to go back and reflect on their skill level and learn the basic stuff instead of working on their acting skills on the street.
 
PKR said:
I recall that you have a Fuji x-100? How do people in public react to your camera? Would black version make a difference?
Click to expand...

Actually a pink version would likely work best. No one would take it seriously. Or maybe one of those bodies made out of Legos? :)
 
Roger Hicks said:
Probably. Frances and I shoot together a lot (for a given value of 'together' -- sometimes we're not in sight of one another). But equally, as I get more grandfatherly, the differences seem to diminish. ...
Click to expand...

I'm a 65-yr. old white guy and I have a ten year old daughter, adopted from China. Last year I was standing around the ball field where my daughter was playing with other kids in a summer day camp. I had a DSLR with me and was taking pictures of her play. Very quickly I was confronted by the camp staff, asking who I was and what was I doing. Eventually, after they checked my ID and their records via radio to staff headquarters, they backed off. But I'm pretty certain that if I'd been the typical 'soccer mom' taking the same pictures, I would not have been confronted.

This year I was at Cape Cod riding around on a bike and stopping wherever to take landscape photos. At one point I stopped at a beach parking lot and starting making a photograph of the beach and ocean, in which some kids were playing. The kids were probably 100 yards away. Before I'd snapped off two shots, a guy jumps out of his truck and yells at me to "stop taking pictures of my kids!" I tried to show him the picture I'd taken, on the screen of my XPro1. I thought that when he saw I'd been using a wide-angle lens, he'd see that his kids were mere specs in the scene. But nope; he just got more belligerent, threatening to call the cops. I told him to go right ahead, as I bicycled off down the road. I know I could have argued that his kids don't really have any rights to not be photographed in a public space, but... whatever.

I've also had security guards outside office buildings ask me not to take pictures of their lobby spaces viewable from the street.

Are things getting worse? Has the media frenzy fueled by need to sensationalize everything caused a LOT of people to respond to photographers with a knee-jerk paranoid reaction?

I often respond to these folks by asking them how we'd know what early 20th century America looked like if some photographer had not made 'street' photographs. I've never noticed any 'light bulbs' coming on when I pose that thought to them. Maybe they consider it later after they go home feeling better that they've protected society from the terrorist/pervert photographer.
 
Jamie Pillers said:
I'm a 65-yr. old white guy and I have a ten year old daughter, adopted from China. Last year I was standing around the ball field where my daughter was playing with other kids in a summer day camp. I had a DSLR with me and was taking pictures of her play. Very quickly I was confronted by the camp staff, asking who I was and what was I doing. Eventually, after they checked my ID and their records via radio to staff headquarters, they backed off. But I'm pretty certain that if I'd been the typical 'soccer mom' taking the same pictures, I would not have been confronted.

This year I was at Cape Cod riding around on a bike and stopping wherever to take landscape photos. At one point I stopped at a beach parking lot and starting making a photograph of the beach and ocean, in which some kids were playing. The kids were probably 100 yards away. Before I'd snapped off two shots, a guy jumps out of his truck and yells at me to "stop taking pictures of my kids!" I tried to show him the picture I'd taken, on the screen of my XPro1. I thought that when he saw I'd been using a wide-angle lens, he'd see that his kids were mere specs in the scene. But nope; he just got more belligerent, threatening to call the cops. I told him to go right ahead, as I bicycled off down the road. I know I could have argued that his kids don't really have any rights to not be photographed in a public space, but... whatever.

I've also had security guards outside office buildings ask me not to take pictures of their lobby spaces viewable from the street.

Are things getting worse? Has the media frenzy fueled by need to sensationalize everything caused a LOT of people to respond to photographers with a knee-jerk paranoid reaction?

I often respond to these folks by asking them how we'd know what early 20th century America looked like if some photographer had not made 'street' photographs. I've never noticed any 'light bulbs' coming on when I pose that thought to them. Maybe they consider it later after they go home feeling better that they've protected society from the terrorist/pervert photographer.
Click to expand...

You should chuck a copy of the photographers rights laws to photograph anything in a public space in your bag, and just bring it out and give it to them when you get confronted. I know some people definitely hassled more than others.
 
if one wants to disappear...wear an hawaiian shirt and use a sony rx100...completely invisable!
Click to expand...
Agree with Joe here - how others "code" you is probably the biggest factor. Being different - whether by the type of camera you hold, or through appearance or behaviour - is most likely to gain attention. In paranoid societies, being different is likely to be coded as "potential threat".
A tourist in a hawaiian shirt carrying a pink camera is not likely to be coded as a threat. Neither is a woman carrying a DSLR with kids in tow, or a bunch of kids with cell phones. Behaviour and presentation (including confidence) that is different from what is expected in any given context is likely to gain attention.
 
Are things getting worse? Has the media frenzy fueled by need to sensationalize everything caused a LOT of people to respond to photographers with a knee-jerk paranoid reaction?
Click to expand...
Jamie, I don't think your experience is uncommon in countries like the US, Britain and Australia. The public are not interested in facts when their emotional buttons have been pushed. People in these societies have been primed to look for threats.
 
lynnb said:
Jamie, I don't think your experience is uncommon in countries like the US, Britain and Australia. The public are not interested in facts when their emotional buttons have been pushed. People in these societies have been primed to look for threats.
Click to expand...

Lynn, I get the feeling that in the situations I've faced, the people confronting me weren't even very worried or scared of what I was doing. They were just looking for an opportunity to harass someone... for what reason's I can only imagine.
 
Phat said:
The urge to go and photograph should come from a creative drive, not the need to go out and play the street photographer because its the cool thing to do. People who lack confidence also lack creativity and hence its better for them to go back and reflect on their skill level and learn the basic stuff instead of working on their acting skills on the street.
Click to expand...
No, I think that is absolutely, flatly untrue. It may be true for you but there have been plenty of confident artists and plenty who lack confidence. On what basis (other than your own immediately personal experience) do you make your assertion?

I'd also add that there are a lot of people who are extremely confident about taking pictures, but utterly incompetent at it.

Cheers,

R.
 
Jamie Pillers said:
Actually a pink version would likely work best. No one would take it seriously. Or maybe one of those bodies made out of Legos? :)
Click to expand...
That's one reason why I love the polka dot Op/Tech Hood Hats I use on my Leicas. Very few people believe that a serious photographer would use anything that looks as silly as that, so (unless they know a fair amount about cameras) they 'read' my M9 or MP as a point-and-shoot.

Cheers,

R.
 
lynnb said:
Jamie, I don't think your experience is uncommon in countries like the US, Britain and Australia. The public are not interested in facts when their emotional buttons have been pushed. People in these societies have been primed to look for threats.
Click to expand...
Dear Lynn,

But, mercifully, such attitudes are still uncommon in most of the rest of the world.

Cheers,

R.
 
Jamie Pillers said:
. . . Are things getting worse? Has the media frenzy fueled by need to sensationalize everything caused a LOT of people to respond to photographers with a knee-jerk paranoid reaction? . . .
Click to expand...
Yes. But see my post above. This is one reason I'm glad I don't live in either the UK or the USA any more (I've never been to Australia).

Cheers,

R.
 
Roger Hicks said:
Dear Lynn,

But, mercifully, such attitudes are still uncommon in most of the rest of the world.

Cheers,

R.
Click to expand...

Out of my travels I would admit that those in my own country have the worst reactions to being photographed.

Everywhere else most people don't mind.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom