fondueman
Member
hello all. i was dusting off the family jewels the other day when i was sprung by a friend with some of my best toys on the kitchen table. i am a retired pro photographer, shooting now more for pleasure rather than money and in the past couple of years i have started accumulating different cameras for various reasons. trying to avoid what you all call GAS i have collected a few leicas over the years and some bessas recently. my friend asked me why so many cameras (i only had four out) when, didn't they all do the same thing?
i said leicas did this because... and the bessas were a less expensive version fo the same thing, in short. then i began to wonder. i have always used cameras as tools not trophies, grabbing the right tool for the job, from film to digital SLRs.
so i began to think, which two would i take to cuba and eastern europe with me next year. i have an Epson RD1s which i bought because so many people raved about it. i like it a lot. so i thought i'd take that with maybe a CV21 on it. but i have to take a film camera.
i began to toss up the M6 against the R2A or the R4M. i'm a very fit and active 63 year old, not a "tour traveller" with white runners (i prefer RedWing hightop soft toe work boots) and will be moving around a lot with as light a load as possible, probably eurailpass in europe.
other lenses (for expense economy in case something were to happen to my cameras) i thought the Nokton 40 and maybe the CV 28/1.9. i like these three lenses a lot and to mix and match over to the RD1s and the film camera gives me an assortment of focal lengths.
so i thought i'd pose the question to you lot. M6 or R2A/R4M...and WHY?
thanks,
frank
i said leicas did this because... and the bessas were a less expensive version fo the same thing, in short. then i began to wonder. i have always used cameras as tools not trophies, grabbing the right tool for the job, from film to digital SLRs.
so i began to think, which two would i take to cuba and eastern europe with me next year. i have an Epson RD1s which i bought because so many people raved about it. i like it a lot. so i thought i'd take that with maybe a CV21 on it. but i have to take a film camera.
i began to toss up the M6 against the R2A or the R4M. i'm a very fit and active 63 year old, not a "tour traveller" with white runners (i prefer RedWing hightop soft toe work boots) and will be moving around a lot with as light a load as possible, probably eurailpass in europe.
other lenses (for expense economy in case something were to happen to my cameras) i thought the Nokton 40 and maybe the CV 28/1.9. i like these three lenses a lot and to mix and match over to the RD1s and the film camera gives me an assortment of focal lengths.
so i thought i'd pose the question to you lot. M6 or R2A/R4M...and WHY?
thanks,
frank