Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
Personally, I don't understand the reasoning behind buying a small mirrorless camera and putting a grip on it and making it larger than a typical entry-level DSLR. ...
Its the lenses... the m43 lenses are sooooo much more compact and so much lighter than DSLR lenses!
ZlatkoBatistich
Established
I've had no problems with shooting kids basketball games indoors. The only caveat is to use single AF and don't even think about continuous AF. I can shoot the 45/1.8 at ISO 400 and still have enough shutter speed left over to freeze action.
Thanks for the tip about using single AF; continuous AF hunts too much. I'm shooting in a much dimmer place, mostly using ISO 6400, 1/500th, f/1.8. If it were bright enough for ISO 400, I think the AF would be much better.
ZlatkoBatistich
Established
Its the lenses... the m43 lenses are sooooo much more compact and so much lighter than DSLR lenses!
Yes, the lenses are dramatically smaller and lighter. Compare the sizes and weights here (mouse over for measurements):
http://camerasize.com/compact/#482.346,380.298,482.366,380.7,ha,t
Sejanus.Aelianus
Veteran
Enjoy your new camera, Olympus makes really special stuff and great lenses to boot
To be fair, they do get it wrong, sometimes. Anyone remember the E-10 and E-20? I owned an E-20 for a few years and I wanted so much to like it, if nothing else for its superb build quality and excellent lens. At the end of the day, though, the sensor quality just wasn't there, unless you got really good light. Sometimes, though, it did provide a pleasant suprise...

marcr1230
Well-known
I tried an shooting an indoor track meet yesterday
The AF performance was not good enough.
lighting was horrible - I was shooting at ISO 5000 with the 75/1.8 at 2.0 and 1/1000.
In the end - I dumped the AF and went MF, prefocus (with the magnify mode) and shoot away - the results were useable for my purposes - I don't remember my Nikon DSLR this way - oh well , It's still my goto camera for 95% of what I do.
The AF performance was not good enough.
lighting was horrible - I was shooting at ISO 5000 with the 75/1.8 at 2.0 and 1/1000.
In the end - I dumped the AF and went MF, prefocus (with the magnify mode) and shoot away - the results were useable for my purposes - I don't remember my Nikon DSLR this way - oh well , It's still my goto camera for 95% of what I do.

I agree, this camera is the real deal. It has a lot going for it. The size is delightful. For example, with the 75/1.8 Olympus lens, it is a tiny little thing compared to a DSLR with a 70-200/2.8, 70-200/4, 135/2, 200/2 or 200/2.8.
The autofocus is excellent for portraits and most subjects. However, so far I haven't had very good luck with indoor sport (basketball) in a poorly lit setting (ISO 6400, 1/500th, f/1.8). At such a low light level, the autofocus doesn't seem to work as well as the AF on my Canon cameras. I've been trying different settings, but haven't yet found one that is really satisfactory for that.
Share: