Enoyarnam
Member
Dear all,
After a long spell using a Zorki 4 I kicked off the New Year (hurrah!) by buying a Voigtlander R2S from Robert White in the UK.
I am now updating the accessories that I use. My focus of my query comes in two parts.
First, how does the Nikon varifocal viewfinder (with the special 28mm attachment) compare in terms of ease of use (and brightness) with the Voigtlander 28mm brightline viewfinder?
Clearly, the Voigtlander finder is good value for money. But I do wonder whether it is the best long-term investment.
Second, how does the Nikon varifocal viewfinder (with or without the 28mm attachment) compare with the KMZ (or Zeiss) universal finder?
Once again, it would appear that the non-Nikon finders are far cheaper and more freely available (i.e. from Ffordes). But are they better in terms of their quality and ease of use?
I would warmly appreciate any feedback relating to the issues that I have outlined above.
Best regards
Eugene
After a long spell using a Zorki 4 I kicked off the New Year (hurrah!) by buying a Voigtlander R2S from Robert White in the UK.
I am now updating the accessories that I use. My focus of my query comes in two parts.
First, how does the Nikon varifocal viewfinder (with the special 28mm attachment) compare in terms of ease of use (and brightness) with the Voigtlander 28mm brightline viewfinder?
Clearly, the Voigtlander finder is good value for money. But I do wonder whether it is the best long-term investment.
Second, how does the Nikon varifocal viewfinder (with or without the 28mm attachment) compare with the KMZ (or Zeiss) universal finder?
Once again, it would appear that the non-Nikon finders are far cheaper and more freely available (i.e. from Ffordes). But are they better in terms of their quality and ease of use?
I would warmly appreciate any feedback relating to the issues that I have outlined above.
Best regards
Eugene