dave lackey
Veteran
Will it? Will the $819 BILLION stimulus package help photographers find a job? How will construction projects and all the pork projects (whatever they may be we do not know as the public has not seen them), help photography? Maybe documenting corruption?
This is not meant as a political thread. I am interested in how my world of photography will be included in this historic event.
If you think the economic stimulus will help, please inform me as I cannot see the forest for the trees.
This is not meant as a political thread. I am interested in how my world of photography will be included in this historic event.
If you think the economic stimulus will help, please inform me as I cannot see the forest for the trees.
Last edited:
Pickett Wilson
Veteran
Sadly, the rapidly shrinking job market for photographers started long before the current economic woes. There is still a need, though, for photographers who have still & video skills, video and audio editing skills, and a good working knowledge of photoshop. Oh, and willing to work your butt off for relatively low pay!
Like they tell public school teachers when they pay them poorly, "It's not about the money...it's a calling."
Like they tell public school teachers when they pay them poorly, "It's not about the money...it's a calling."
Tuolumne
Veteran
We can always take pictures of road projects.
/T
/T
Al Kaplan
Veteran
We started into a downward spiral with auto exposure SLR's with zoom lense together with one hour labs. Digital speeded up the process. Now probably 90% of the jobs that would have involved hiring a photographer a decade or two ago are shot by somebody in the office. The pictures might not be all that great, but for the price they're good enough. You see them in newspapers, newletters, government and corporate brochures, everyplace. Get used to it.
bmattock
Veteran
Perhaps, if the government repeats what was done before. Not many were hired, though the work they produced was amazing.
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/fsahtml/fahome.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farm_Security_Administration
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/fsahtml/fahome.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farm_Security_Administration
pesphoto
Veteran
What Al say's is true, companies are doing things in house and not hiring out so much anymore. Im fortunate to be a staff shooter for a large Pharmacy chain. They built their own have a studio right in the world headquarters. I was fortunate to find my way in.
Chriscrawfordphoto
Real Men Shoot Film.
That money is going to be totally wasted and it won't benefit any ordinary citizen, photographer or not.
To the guy who said public school teachers are underpaid: The starting pay where I live is $35,000 a year to work 9 months. Even if it was for 12 months of work it is more than 90% of the people in my city earn, and it is enough to live decently because the cost of living is VERY low here. The average teacher here makes over $50,000 a year...the new ones starting at $35k will be making much more after they get tenure.
To the guy who said public school teachers are underpaid: The starting pay where I live is $35,000 a year to work 9 months. Even if it was for 12 months of work it is more than 90% of the people in my city earn, and it is enough to live decently because the cost of living is VERY low here. The average teacher here makes over $50,000 a year...the new ones starting at $35k will be making much more after they get tenure.
kully
Happy Snapper
No, not at all. It's making it worse for 'photographers'.
Less money means less companies willing to spend money on hiring someone for something when George in Department AS11 has a DSLR and lots of photography magazines on his desk.
Times are different from when Frankie was given some dough and sent out - everyone has a camera now, and don't forget the thousands (in the UK at least) of qualified photography students that leave education each year. Sure, they may not know aperture from their bottom loading - but which company would care about your gorgeously printed shot of a couple kissing whilst jumping into a puddle twixt billboards symbolising the end of an era?
Less money means less companies willing to spend money on hiring someone for something when George in Department AS11 has a DSLR and lots of photography magazines on his desk.
Times are different from when Frankie was given some dough and sent out - everyone has a camera now, and don't forget the thousands (in the UK at least) of qualified photography students that leave education each year. Sure, they may not know aperture from their bottom loading - but which company would care about your gorgeously printed shot of a couple kissing whilst jumping into a puddle twixt billboards symbolising the end of an era?
What we need are tax cuts (corporate, personal, and capital gains.) This is what gets the economy going, and what will employ all sorts of people including photographers.
Al Kaplan
Veteran
Tax cuts is what got us into this financial quagmire to begin with. We're paying for a war with money our grandchildren have yet to earn, so we're borrowing it from the Chinese.
monochromejrnl
Well-known
and the chinese made their money taxing local companies that benefitted from US companies outsourcing their manufacturing of consumer products that now fill US landfills... it's the 'free market' wonderful ;P
Well, where does the billions in bailout money come from? It comes from private and public economic activity, not government, and what spurs that activity are incentives, and incentives are low taxes.
What caused this mess was congress (both republican and democrat congresses, btw) that decided it was a good idea to give mortgages to people who couldn't pay them back, and Fannie/Freddie paying off those congressmen to look the other way while they cooked the books and sold the worthless paper.
When it's easy to get a mortgage, everyone wants one, and real estate prices went up artificially.
The people at Fannie/Freddie should be in jail along with the Enron, Tyco, and Worldcom execs. This mess makes those bankruptcies look like the closing of a corner store.
This video is worth a watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQtq77RQRf0
What caused this mess was congress (both republican and democrat congresses, btw) that decided it was a good idea to give mortgages to people who couldn't pay them back, and Fannie/Freddie paying off those congressmen to look the other way while they cooked the books and sold the worthless paper.
When it's easy to get a mortgage, everyone wants one, and real estate prices went up artificially.
The people at Fannie/Freddie should be in jail along with the Enron, Tyco, and Worldcom execs. This mess makes those bankruptcies look like the closing of a corner store.
This video is worth a watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQtq77RQRf0
Last edited by a moderator:
Frank Petronio
Well-known
The idea that the government can somehow spend money more efficiently than the private sector is illogical... it's never been done before. All they want to do is grab more power and votes -- if they wanted to stimulate the economy they would go on austerity budgets, cut taxes, and let local communities have control over regulations, set-asides, healthcare, education, and social programs, etc. We'd pay less, invest more, and have more of a say in what happens in our communities.
That said, the best place for a photographer to be is Washington, D.C. and/or as a Paparazzi-style or Porno Blogger -- those are the only growth areas in professional photography that I see right now. Maybe Obama will create another WPA-style organization? I see they stuck a big hunk of cash in for the NEA... But those are political as hell and you know everyone is connected that ends up with anything. Watch Alec Soth get a huge grant since he's politically correct....
As more people are unemployed, more of them will have time to surf the internet, so internet content will be valuable -- you just have to churn a lot of it out to make any money (digital...)
These photographers are making money:
http://www.theselby.com/
http://www.lastnightsparty.com/
There is some guy in Arizona who flies in pornstars for the weekend and posts the results, I read that he was clearing $500K per year. But I lost the URL, I never bookmark those things.
See! You can do it too.... Zig Ziglar and Tony Robbins approve!
That said, the best place for a photographer to be is Washington, D.C. and/or as a Paparazzi-style or Porno Blogger -- those are the only growth areas in professional photography that I see right now. Maybe Obama will create another WPA-style organization? I see they stuck a big hunk of cash in for the NEA... But those are political as hell and you know everyone is connected that ends up with anything. Watch Alec Soth get a huge grant since he's politically correct....
As more people are unemployed, more of them will have time to surf the internet, so internet content will be valuable -- you just have to churn a lot of it out to make any money (digital...)
These photographers are making money:
http://www.theselby.com/
http://www.lastnightsparty.com/
There is some guy in Arizona who flies in pornstars for the weekend and posts the results, I read that he was clearing $500K per year. But I lost the URL, I never bookmark those things.
See! You can do it too.... Zig Ziglar and Tony Robbins approve!
bmattock
Veteran
Which was a brilliant maneuver on our part. The Chinese were running a huge trade surplus with us. They ended up with so much money, they were running out of place to put it all. They bought up trillions in US debt and then invested in a bunch of US banking and brokerage houses (pre-collapse). Now they are chained to us at the hip. We go down, they go down. We can't buy their lousy goods unless we have easy access to credit and an unlimited debt ceiling. So they must continue to finance us.
It's totally cool. They'll never invade us, but they thought they'd buy us. We pulled sucked them in and now we totally pwn them. Lolz.
If I'm bankrupt for a thousand dollars, I have a problem. If I'm bankrupt for a billion dollars, my debtors have a problem. When governments are bankrupt, all the countries that own that country's debt have a problem.
Al Patterson
Ferroequinologist
Will it? Will the $819 BILLION stimulus package help photographers find a job? How will construction projects and all the pork projects (whatever they may be we do not know as the public has not seen them), help photography? Maybe documenting corruption?
This is not meant as a political thread. I am interested in how my world of photography will be included in this historic event.
If you think the economic stimulus will help, please inform me as I cannot see the forest for the trees.
This package is a pork-fest. If you think this will help, you are kidding yourself. Now maybe if you photograph some of these projects on spec, and self-publish your own book on this this era, it might. But you're on your own.
Frank Petronio
Well-known
Actually I think the economy stalled in order to screw over Putin and put the brakes on China, I know the USA and EU can absorb the losses far better than those countries can, so it is sort of an economic war taking place behind the scenes.
Really we want a lot of foreign investment and borrowing. China needs us to be successful and can't afford to fight with us, plus our cost of living has gone down since our buyer power has increased.
It's sort of an either-or situation -- either we're complete isolationists or we just open everything up. It's probably better for the world -- peace and prosperity wise -- to have a world-wide market.
The news media spreads all this doom and gloom. Meanwhile real people are still going to work and building houses and the mall parking lots are full. I think half this "collapse" is psychological and set upon us by a careless, immoral, and incompetent press. Not one outlet has done any digging or research, they just use press releases and allow themselves to be spun.
Right now we are living better than any society in the history of the world. And what do we hear on the news? It's the freaking end-times. Right....
As far as being a photographer, the middle of the bell curve of the market is... umm, gone.
Really we want a lot of foreign investment and borrowing. China needs us to be successful and can't afford to fight with us, plus our cost of living has gone down since our buyer power has increased.
It's sort of an either-or situation -- either we're complete isolationists or we just open everything up. It's probably better for the world -- peace and prosperity wise -- to have a world-wide market.
The news media spreads all this doom and gloom. Meanwhile real people are still going to work and building houses and the mall parking lots are full. I think half this "collapse" is psychological and set upon us by a careless, immoral, and incompetent press. Not one outlet has done any digging or research, they just use press releases and allow themselves to be spun.
Right now we are living better than any society in the history of the world. And what do we hear on the news? It's the freaking end-times. Right....
As far as being a photographer, the middle of the bell curve of the market is... umm, gone.
Last edited:
Yes, the media is part of our problem. They really think most of us can't think for ourselves.
But one post on these issues is more than enough for me for a few days...
But one post on these issues is more than enough for me for a few days...
Al Patterson
Ferroequinologist
Tax cuts have pulled our butt out of the fire before. JFK, Reagan and Bush all used tax cuts to spur periods of growth. The problem is that both Democratic and Republican congresses spend money in a way that would embarrass a drunken sailor on shore leave. If Congress were forced to budget like the rest of us, we wouldn't be were we are. This includes spending on wars as well as on iinfrastructure, retirement, etc. If I have to live within my income, how come the pinheads in Washington can't (or won't)?
