Enlarger questions.....

Over-hyped or not i find the Focomats 1c and 2c make excellent prints and often prefer to use them over the Devere 504 for exhibition work. I never use the autofocus system on either Focomat as one is mounted on a shelf (to enable enlargements up to 36") and the depth of my easels vary so even with recalibration i'd have to re-adjust each time i swapped easels. On the question of lens quality i now use the Focatar 2 100mm lens on my Devere when making prints - the difference between that and other 100-105 and 80-90mm lenses Nikon, Schneider and Rodenstock (including the Apos from both brands) was certainly noticeable to me resulting in a considerable amount of time re-printing some images. Parts for both these enlargers are still available including some new from Germany - the company and weblink i posted a few months back in another thread.

It was seeing some of Ralph Gibson's early prints made on a Focamat 1 that pointed me towards the Leitz enlargers.

What makes the most noticeable difference to me, is an enlarger set-up that is correctly aligned in all the planes including the enlarger easel. Then you really can see edge to edge grain.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Focomat 1 question:
How available are bulbs? Can modern lenses i.e., schneider, rodenstock be used with the autofocus feature?
 
BigSteve - if it is a standard old-school, condenser enlarger, most use screw in opal bulbs.

Here in the US , I know that PH211 and PH212 are still available. Those are the GE #'s for 12Ov/75w and 120v/150w bulbs, respectively. The opal bulbs look like house-hold incandescents.

Variable contrast enlarger heads on the hand use halogens and they are available at bulb suppliers like topbulb.com

Cold lamps are special order as well, but I would bet through Arista or Zone VI. I think that these may be spectrum specific. The last time I used one was on an Omega D5 back in the early 90's and I didn't have maintain the beast.
 
The Autocord is one of my fun cameras - by that I mean I shoot for me. I feel the same way about my Leica IIIf.

Even though the Rolleiflex has superior optics, build and smoothness of operation, I still prefer the focus lever to a knob. I use the Rolleiflex for group photos at work. The Autocord is more of a street shooter.
 
BigSteveG said:
Focomat 1 question:
How available are bulbs? Can modern lenses i.e., schneider, rodenstock be used with the autofocus feature?


There is a special "spacer" between the lens and the mounting mechanism so i'm not sure that other lenses would fit. To focus manually you move the lens on the helliod mount and without the right spacer i doubt there would be enough "room" to adjust the focus. The 1c is easy to recalibrate re the auto focus system but is has to be matched to the depth of your baseboard easel - one reason why the Leitz enlargers came with their own design locking baseboard easels i guess....

Re: V/C heads you can buy a Heiland Split Grade Head that fits both the 1c and 2c but this unit is expensive and last time i priced it all up (which was a few years back) the VC head cost well over £1000 before shipping.

Re: bulbs i replaced both of mine with 150w lamps instead of the standard 75w - the exact make/brand i can't tell you until i'm back in the UK (early Dec) but i did replace mine two years ago from a local electrical shop.

What you do need to make sure you have with the Focmat 1c is the AN Filter that slips directly underneath the condenser lens and "sits" on the negative making a single piece glass holder. I just got a brand new replacement for mine off Ebay from Japan they are easy to scratch and like hen's teeth to find!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
COLD LIGHT, COLD LIGHT, COLD LIGHT.

I have no experience with newer, more "modern" versions of the Aristo, which I take from Drew to be better for variable contrast papers. I never use(d) variable contrast papers a lot anyway.

When I changed to cold light I re-calibrated my metering and processing. I never turned back. It works for me. But if someone makes a great print from condensor or even point source, I would never say "you should have used cold light/diffusion". A great print is a great print.

Edit: Oh, and I never had a problem setting up my Beseler 45MX. Dunno what all the fuss is over that. I wouldn't reject the gift of a Focomat either.
 
Oh, enlarging discussion! I have used a bunch of different enlargers over the years - ranging from a Salzman 11x14 (now you are talking REALLT large - 12 foot column and a table you could throw dance parties on!) down to Minox! My standard enlarger though was always either the Focomat 1c or the IIc. What sets them apart from the rest is simply german over-engineerig. They are built to stay in line and to withstand heavy use (particularly the IIc which was standard fare in most newspapers in the 60's and 70's).
When I used to shoot industrial stuff (120/4x5) I used a D6 Omega for color and a Beseler CB 7 for black/white. The CB7 had the first version of the Aristo VC cold light head on it. It works well, but the main problem is the light out put. Exposures could be very long (45-60 sec). The later versions evidently has adressed this and the output is better.
If you are shooting multiple formats, go for the D5/D6. yes, it is big but even at 4x5 setting the light is even across the easel. You do need to brace it though - the angled column is a bit prone to shake, particularly if it is in top position!
If your shooting is mainly 35/120 - the later version of the Focomat IIc is the ultimate, particularly with the later Focotar lenses (60/100mm). Beware of IIc's with "lens upgrades" as that usually screws up the auto focus. They are matched lenses/enlarger. Ideal one is a late grey IIC Color which has the filterdrawer for Multigrade filters (though you can lift the "head" off and stick 4"x4' inch filters on the condensor if it is a non Color version). Prices seems to go all over the places, from "freebies" from Institutions/Newspapers to over priced ones from private sellers. Always check that it comes with the 35/6x6/6x9 masks too (these are $100 + these days). Also check condition of condensor (you dont even want to know what a replacement costs!). Once you have set up a IIc's auto focus - thats it. It will stay in focus for the rest of yours or its life span!
The Focomat Ic is similar, except that it will only do 24x36 or smaller. My current one is a late grey with filter drawer and I have had that one for about 10 years. Occasionally (about every 3-4 years I check the auto focus - mostly to make the enlarger feel appriciated - and so far it has stayed put!). I use the Focotar-2 50/4.5 on it - I bought the lens in 1975 and had ELcan (Ernst Leitz Canada) realign it and optimize it for 11x14 size prints. So far I have never found a better lens! I have several Focotar-2's as well as a couple of 63mm/f2.8 and f4 El Nikkors (these are again among the best lenses you can buy for 35, particularly the f4!). These are used on a Ultra High Resolution ELCAN 121 Point Source Enlarger (supposedly 6 times the resolution that can be achieved by a condensor system). Of course, it has an electronic shutter which at the moment has decided to not work and one of my projects is now to build a LED light source instead!
The cheapest alternative for a Focomat style enlarger is actually a Valoy II. This is the non auto focussing version of the Focomat - same condensor and same even light out put - and it can use the Focotar lenses as well as other brands. A late, grey version with the tall upright (4 ft) is not a bad deal. Eugeen Smith printed most of his stuff with one of these and so did Larry Clark.
I did have a couple of V35's, but I never got along with it. The 40f2.8 lens is not even close to what a Focotar-2 can do, and the whole contraption looks like some kind of kitchen utensil. It is also getting difficult to get parts and negative carriers for them. Lots of plastic parts on them too that will snap! Many of these were bought by Auto Trader publishers and used heavily (to put it mildly) before they went digital.
The clamp down easels for the Focomat's are a bonus as they will REALLY stay in place. The later version (white baseboard) took away this feature though. Leica also made some rather fancy easels, the early 2 blade wooden ones and the piece de resistance, the 8x10 diecast 4 bladed 8x10 easel ( I think in the 1983 price list it was listed at $750!).
Interestingly enough, Leica was considering a Focotar -3 50/4.5 for the V35, but the added height required for a 11x14 introduced vibration when the "arm" was fully up and the fact the the V35 also was geared to the color printer, it was found too slow. They made a couple of prototypes of it and I picked one up at an auction last year. It works fine on my Ic and it is possible that it is better than my Focotar-2 but the margin is so small that I cant see the difference. Once the LED source is finished I will put it in the Point Source enlarger and try it out.
For those who are looking for the ultimate in sharpness, point source is the way to go (both Beseler and Omega made these light sources), but beware - it will show EVERY flaw in the film and never,ever use it for portraits -nobody looks that good!
 
Back
Top Bottom