semi-ambivalent
Little to say
Hi all, this is my first post here. I recently made the switch from SLR to RF and settled on the tried-and-tested M3 + Elmar-M 5cm f3.5 combo. The M3 seems to be a beautiful camera, but I'm almost wishing I went with an M2 as I'm having trouble seeing the 50mm frame lines with my glasses.
I intend on shooting Eastman Double-X with this setup. Tom - I have read some of your posts and understand you also shoot an Elmar-M 5/3.5 with this film. I would love to see some photos you have taken with this combination.
So far I have purchased Double-X pre-loaded from Camera Film Photo in HK. I liked the results but found it to be a little too high in contrast and grainy for my liking. This was probably due to the fact that I pushed the film to ~400 with Rodinal 1:50. Results with ID-11 1:1 were smoother, had better tonality and less grain. I've read the Elmar 5/3.5 is a rather low-contrast lens so I am interested to try the 400ASA + Rodinal 1:50 combination once again.
I invested in an ITOOY hood for the Elmar. Would I also need a yellow filter for outdoor shooting?
Best,
R
![]()
I process Tri-X in Rodinal and have found that adding 0.50 grams of borax to the working solution minimizes the grain quite a bit while still giving me the Rodinal mid-tones. It would be a very cheap experiment to try it once or twice on the Double-X. About the contrast I would add that Rodinal is quite responsive to changes in agitation regime as well as development time. A pity to give up after just a couple rolls.
Good Luck,
s-a