lukitas
second hand noob
Praise can be just as terrifying as critique.
(imagine a slightly nasal voice) 'I love how you got that horizon straight' 'f2 at 1/30th is just perfect for this night scene'
Makes me feel like an incompetent. 'Excellent, johnny, you managed to tie your own shoe-laces'. As if I didn't really know what I was doing.
I try not to comment on other peoples work. If they don't know what's good in their photographs, they must be incompetent. If it's bad, or even just mediocre, they'll have to learn to see for themselves what is wrong.
Getting likes will sometimes tell you one of your photos is better than you thought. Most likely, the likes are because they know the person or the place depicted. Or they need to suck up to you and like an under-exposed, badly shaken smear because they need your approval. 'Let me tell you how artistic you are...'
That's another reason why I don't like issuing comments, wether of praise, or fiery flames : the politicking that goes on in these sites where people congregate to share photos :
I'll give you points if you give me points. urgh.
I still have trouble separating my own work into mediocre, ordinary, interesting or brilliant.
Mostly I get stuck at 'showable' versus 'not to be seen', and I have a hard time weeding out the 'forgettable but ok' from the 'quite interesting'. Sometimes, fessebook and the gallery help in the weeding out process; but after seeing what gets looks and likes and comments, I must admit to being sceptical about the powers of critique of social media.
But I do post, and I do look. Seeing what gets liked is an exercise in cultural anthropology.
(imagine a slightly nasal voice) 'I love how you got that horizon straight' 'f2 at 1/30th is just perfect for this night scene'
Makes me feel like an incompetent. 'Excellent, johnny, you managed to tie your own shoe-laces'. As if I didn't really know what I was doing.
I try not to comment on other peoples work. If they don't know what's good in their photographs, they must be incompetent. If it's bad, or even just mediocre, they'll have to learn to see for themselves what is wrong.
Getting likes will sometimes tell you one of your photos is better than you thought. Most likely, the likes are because they know the person or the place depicted. Or they need to suck up to you and like an under-exposed, badly shaken smear because they need your approval. 'Let me tell you how artistic you are...'
That's another reason why I don't like issuing comments, wether of praise, or fiery flames : the politicking that goes on in these sites where people congregate to share photos :
I'll give you points if you give me points. urgh.
I still have trouble separating my own work into mediocre, ordinary, interesting or brilliant.
Mostly I get stuck at 'showable' versus 'not to be seen', and I have a hard time weeding out the 'forgettable but ok' from the 'quite interesting'. Sometimes, fessebook and the gallery help in the weeding out process; but after seeing what gets looks and likes and comments, I must admit to being sceptical about the powers of critique of social media.
But I do post, and I do look. Seeing what gets liked is an exercise in cultural anthropology.