fastest Rolleiflex CLA?

J

jojoman2

Guest
I picked up a Rolleiwide about five months ago and have been debating whether or not to send it in for a CLA. The focusing felt pretty stiff in the winter, so I didn't use it very much (I also didn't have a filter for it then). Now that it has gotten warmer, the camera isn't so stiff.

My main issue with the camera--the focusing glass is very dull and scratched. I've taken the glass out and polished it, slightly better. I'm curious, is there any reason why I couldn't just order a brighter screen and replace it myself? Has anyone here done that? I'm not willing to send the camera off for three months at this point, unfortunately.

Recommendations for CLAs with a fast turnaround time?

Thanks everyone
 
I have the wide angle Rolleiflex. I would just send it to Harry and be done with it but I can't be without the camera for 3 months (anything longer than a month won't work because I'm leaving on a trip).

I've been to Krikor's workshop before with a different camera--my experience with him was pretty mixed to be honest. Looking for other options
 
For a screen, you can't go wrong with the ones Rick Oleson is selling-
http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/index-175.html

You can also get a Maxwell screen for ~$250- definitely worth it in some ways but a bit of a jump from the Oleson brightscreen.

Call Krimar Camera and see if he will handle a Rolleiwide for the focusing stiffness. Might as well have him do the wind mechanism as the same time since it has to come out to get to the focus parts. You might also contact Paul Ebel and see what his timing is these days.

[edit: I see your mixed experience with Krimar comment. Understood.]
 
Try Steve's Camera in Culver City, CA.

They just fixed my 2.8GX that no-one else would touch.

You could also try Walter's Camera Repair in downtown LA. They have fixed random stuff (old Kodak Retina that seemed like a lost cause) for me.
 
Harry Fleenor at Oceanside camera. Do it right. I sent my 2.8E to him and he sent it back in 8 wekks. The camera had a ton of problems including film transport issues, misaligned lens and sticky shutter. Everything was fixed and the camera has worked perfectly since then. No issues and no problems
 
I just had my 2.8B repaired locally and it took him 8 months - that is 32 weeks. It has been worked on by two different guys that took only 1-2 weeks each time, but the problem wasn't addressed. I know some of us can't be without our camera for a long time but getting it done right even though it takes time, is a better way IMHO.
 
I just had my 2.8B repaired locally and it took him 8 months - that is 32 weeks. It has been worked on by two different guys that took only 1-2 weeks each time, but the problem wasn't addressed. I know some of us can't be without our camera for a long time but getting it done right even though it takes time, is a better way IMHO.

Should have sent it to Harry Fleenor. People from all over the world send him their Rolleiflexes. I was at his shop and saw all the postcards thanking him!
It would have taken 12 weeks (1 week to ship there, 10 week wait, 1 week to ship back), and it would have been done perfectly.
 
The Rolle Wide is one of the rarer TLR models. Why is speed of turn around so critical? Surely, the first priority is engaging the services of someone who will attend to your camera properly. I'm not saying there are not other competent Rollei repairers in the USA, but, if you are based there I don't know why you wouldn't just send your Wide to Harry. It's not an expense, it's an investment. And remember: we don't really "own" these cameras. They're made to outlast us all, with the typical use they get in 2016. We're their custodians until a future generation of photographers is entrusted with them. Especially with something as uncommon as a Rollei Wide, so please give it the best care you can, and be a good guardian of it, until it's time to pass it on to its new caretaker.
Cheers,
Brett
 
I'm sending the camera to Harry. I came around to thinking about the camera more as an investment, and the amount of repairs required top $500 (I had the camera checked out at Nippon Photo). I thought the camera might only need to be lubed and cleaned, which is why 12 weeks seemed rediculous to me.

Still--I live in New Jersey, not CA, and wanted to avoid shipping the camera. USPS can be brutal.

And Brett, I'm not a caretaker. I'm a photographer--I'm going to be buried with my cameras haha

Anyway--thanks all for weighing in
 
I asked Krikor to put a Maxwell Screen in my Rolleiflex. It came back with some other awful screen. When I called to complain about that he told me 'not to worry about it'. Beware!!....I ended up getting a 'second' from Bill Maxwell and I installed it myself...and I am all thumbs.
 
. I thought the camera might only need to be lubed and cleaned, which is why 12 weeks seemed rediculous to me.

This always confuses me. Do people think that there's an oil plug on the bottom of every camera? You drain the old oil, find the secret opening under the mirror and pour in a demi-quart of new lube, shake it around, and off you drive?

26816367800_583b4b2bcd_k.jpg


And's that just a partial cleaning of an E model.
 
It's not that Harry takes 10 weeks to work on one camera. It's because he is in so much demand that there are dozens of Rolleiflexes in line before yours.
There's a reason for that.
 
Yeah, I can't see Fleenor's work being 12 times better than, say, Krimar. It's his backlog. And it works for him. Remember, almost all users of Rolleiflexes these days are amateurs of one sort or another. Not practicing professionals. The cameras are not working tools. If this was the '60s, Fleenor would be dead taking 12 weeks. Because there were plenty of other places who could do it faster and as well. But poke around any Rollei discussions these days and you'll see Fleenor's name all the time. It's a chicken/egg thing by now- his work is top-notch so those 'in the know' will use him so they can tell their friends. I used to run into someone all the time on the street who would see my camera, a 2.8C, make a point of his being a 2.8F white face, then be certain to drop that Fleenor had overhauled it, as well as the six other Fs he had at home. I never saw him actually take a photo, or saw any images by him, but he always had either a Rolleiflex (F, of course) or a Leica on his shoulder.

Fleenor's working style is based on the tradition of tools for practicing professionals. He has a set price for each task because the approach will be same each time- strip it down, clean, replace parts as needed, relube as needed, get back into spec and working. Close it up and back to work! I used to work with spray painting equipment as part of my job. When there was a problem we would spend fifteen minutes at most cleaning and such. If it didn't clear up, you grabbed a rebuild kit, tore down the gun, replaced most of the moving parts, and got back to work. Not worth trying to get by; there as a job to do and the tool needed to be in top shape.

Similar to a car dealership. I have a 16 year old car that has some undercarriage mud guards loose and torn. When I was at a dealer, their answer was that I could order a new part for $300 and pay them $200 to install it. So next time I was at a neighborhood repairman getting the oil changed I asked him about it. He ran a few sheet metal screws in, no charge, and it is fine. That's against everything a dealer has been trained to do.

Given his core clientele these days, his quality, and his parts inventory, Fleenor could charge a lot more. It's a scary time ahead for us when he retires. I've opened up a lot of Rolleis and gotten almost all of them working again. But I wouldn't touch a Rollei Wide- too rare and too important that nothing go wrong. To Fleenor, it will be just another day at the shop, his umpteenth thousandths time inside a Wide.
 
Back
Top Bottom