Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Flyfisher Tom said:The 50 gives just the right balance of breadth and intimacy.
Well put. It's also a very versatile focal length. I do, however, have a few 35mm lenses. They hardly see any use, but I have them because occasionally I see some use for it.
They're also lighter than most telephotos, and you have many more choices available, new and old, than the wide-angle focal lengths.
visiondr
cyclic iconoclast
The poll results are starting to resemble a bell curve (the 40mm is the anomaly here). Funny how life seems to settle things out that way.
Ron
Ron
Bryan Lee
Expat Street Photographer
The thirty five is my infatuation, For now I have sold off everything but 2 35s and a 90 in 35mm film camera glass. The CV 90 is just a little slow and I hate backing up to frame which I find myself doing sometimes. I always carry 2 bodies, usually with 35s then switch one off to the 90 if the space opens up or I cant get closer. I believe the answer for me this year is to go with another fast 50 and swing a SLR with a 135 or 180 for longer reaches.
My biggest influence were the guys shooting film in Vietnam, One or two Leicas with a Nikon F long lense was the best set up available at any price.
My biggest influence were the guys shooting film in Vietnam, One or two Leicas with a Nikon F long lense was the best set up available at any price.
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
75mm seems under-represented in the poll too; anomalously low for the bell curve. Probably, like the 40, it's not a traditional focal length for interchangeable lens 35's. Yet (as a contrarian?) I think it's as way cool in its own way as the 40. 
mike goldberg
The Peaceful Pacific
For a lot of years the 35 has been my favorite.
Through RFF and occasional 'attacks of GAS,'
I have rediscovered the 50.
Through RFF and occasional 'attacks of GAS,'
I have rediscovered the 50.
markinlondon
Elmar user
mike goldberg said:For a lot of years the 35 has been my favorite.
Through RFF and occasional 'attacks of GAS,'
I have rediscovered the 50.
Ah, RFF, the last bastion of the 50mm lens
raid
Dad Photographer
About 80% of all responses favor using lenses with focal lengths 35mm~50mm. All other focal lengths combined account for the remaining 20% of responses. This result should send some strong message to lens distributers to request additonal lenses in such a range.
Raid
Raid
Kent
Finally at home...
Hi!
I only have 50ish and 42mm for non-SLR. So, I voted for 50 here.
I like to shoot with 28mm (SLR) more than with 35mm.
Kent
I only have 50ish and 42mm for non-SLR. So, I voted for 50 here.
I like to shoot with 28mm (SLR) more than with 35mm.
Kent
Last edited:
chug
I wear pants
The best lens to use is the CV 15mm. Nothing can beat that lens!
mikeb380
Camera Junky
Doug said:75mm seems under-represented in the poll too; anomalously low for the bell curve. Probably, like the 40, it's not a traditional focal length for interchangeable lens 35's. Yet (as a contrarian?) I think it's as way cool in its own way as the 40.![]()
I agree, If I could only have one lens, I would opt for one between 75 - 100 mm. I used my 85 & 100 for years even with multiple lenses longer and shorter. For a WA, I would select a 28mm or even a 24mm. I have an Arsat 16mm which I like muchly but it is not an all purpose lens.
RF-Addict
Well-known
I voted for the 20mm, but I really have the 15mm and right now it is my favorite focal length, but I have to admit that it changes all the time. I tend to rediscover certain focal lengths and declare them as my favorite for awhile. The 15 is just so much fun - it's a whole new world out there
T
tedwhite
Guest
I originally voted for the 28mm because that's what I used for years with my old Pentax Spotmatics.
However, since getting a Bessa R and the 35/2.5 color skopar I've become accustomed to it.
However (second "however"), since getting the Canon 50/1.8 from Frank S. I have been re-discovering a "new" view of life. I put that in quotes as the only lens I had for a year when I began photographing in the sixties was the 50/1.4 Super Takumar.
Later I aquired a 135/2.5 and decided anyone with more than one lens was a "real" photographer.
Ted
However, since getting a Bessa R and the 35/2.5 color skopar I've become accustomed to it.
However (second "however"), since getting the Canon 50/1.8 from Frank S. I have been re-discovering a "new" view of life. I put that in quotes as the only lens I had for a year when I began photographing in the sixties was the 50/1.4 Super Takumar.
Later I aquired a 135/2.5 and decided anyone with more than one lens was a "real" photographer.
Ted
dee
Well-known
i have only 50mm lenses for my Leica - Zorki-Feds , but could / should have sacrificed a pretend Leica or to for a 35m and an 85mm ... but who cares ? If i really need those wode angles , the faithfull Minolta SRs still awaits - and my new ''babies '' are just an escape ..
Curiously , though an Interior Designer needing to take inside record shots , i did invest in 24 / 28 SLR lenses , but find that there is a sense of dee'stortion in a 35mm which isn't there with my 50 mm.
But ASdee is odd in that I find it dee'ficult to alter what is imprinted - so , once the 50 , my sole first lense - 1970s was learned - I can now sense what the camera will ''see'' - and can use both eyes and the field of view is the same .
having said this , I did find an old 100mm Vvitar that has an entirely unintentional softness at f 5.6 and above that gave me dreamy portrait slides !
dee cidely dee
Curiously , though an Interior Designer needing to take inside record shots , i did invest in 24 / 28 SLR lenses , but find that there is a sense of dee'stortion in a 35mm which isn't there with my 50 mm.
But ASdee is odd in that I find it dee'ficult to alter what is imprinted - so , once the 50 , my sole first lense - 1970s was learned - I can now sense what the camera will ''see'' - and can use both eyes and the field of view is the same .
having said this , I did find an old 100mm Vvitar that has an entirely unintentional softness at f 5.6 and above that gave me dreamy portrait slides !
dee cidely dee
dee
Well-known
ASdee dee cidely does NOT like zooms - too big / heavy and confusing ? !
Xmas
Veteran
dee
26 dee
like your signature, though not the one i expected
Noel
26 dee
like your signature, though not the one i expected
Noel
Kent
Finally at home...
I have voted for 50mm but I more and more start to like 35mm-ish (38/40mm) as well!
thefsb
Established
i wonder what the answer would be in an SLR forum. given how they like to zoom, perhaps such a question would be moot.
Sylvaticus
Established
35mm on a FED1g and 80mm on a FED2e. Similar on DSLR: 50mm prime (roughly 75mm equivalent) or standard 18-55mm zoom (roughly 28-80mm). For an old Exakta it has to be 35mm and 135mm because there weren't many around 80mm so they're fairly elusive and expensive these days. So how did I vote? 90mm!
Tom Niblick
Well-known
Favorite Focal Length
Favorite Focal Length
I like the 28mm (21 on M8) because it takes in the same sweep as my eyes.
I like the 50mm (35 on M8) because it frames what I see.
I like the 90mm (75 on M8) because it sees the face I'm focused on with my eyes.
If I could only own one lens it would be a 35 (28 on M8).
Tom
Favorite Focal Length
I like the 28mm (21 on M8) because it takes in the same sweep as my eyes.
I like the 50mm (35 on M8) because it frames what I see.
I like the 90mm (75 on M8) because it sees the face I'm focused on with my eyes.
If I could only own one lens it would be a 35 (28 on M8).
Tom
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.