HuubL
hunter-gatherer
I've got a few Leica LTMs and Ms, all film. Can't choose between the black and nickel 1932 II and the 1939 IIIb for favorite LTM, but the M4 is my favorite M.
... while not wishing to denigrating their owners, as this is frowned on I understand ... the m5 is in fact big and ugly, and lacking an aesthetic sensibility is probably not the best starting point for a photographer you would think?
... while not wishing to denigrating their owners, as this is frowned on I understand ... the m5 is in fact big and ugly, and lacking an aesthetic sensibility is probably not the best starting point for a photographer you would think?
So the Canon 7 is also big and ugly? What about the Soviet Leningrad?
Handsome is as handsome does. In terms of usability, the M5 is right about at the top. But I actually would favor the M6 over it -- "classic" Leica shape; modern battery; 28mm framelines.
For me, the clarity and accuracy of the rangefinder is the sine qua non for a good rangefinder, and I really think nobody has improved on Leica's design and execution. Best camera never made, though, would be a Hexar RF with .85 magnification.
... I'm unsure what that means, but it sounds like a platitude for ugly people, and cameras too I suppose
Never used a Hensoldt, but for me the 'greatest' range finder has to be the Leica M3. I've never used an M2, but not sure I like the film counter on it vs. the M3. I'd like the 35mm lines though.
For favourite, maybe Fujifilm GF670. I just find it remarkable that in this day and age, a company released an aperture priority, 6x6 and 6x7, folding camera. To make matters even more remarkable, they charged one third the cost of a new Leica MP for it, and bundled a great lens too.
In this time of unimagination, I think it's a marvel.
Well let's say that somebody who considers cameras like the Leica 5 and the Canon 7 "ugly" have bad taste but we forgive them.😛