JChrome
Street Worker
Down to the last $10,000 - but not there yet. It would be a crying shame to miss from here...
.Mike
So they raised 240K in 13 days and you think they won't get the last 10K even with 18 days to go?
Tell you what, if it doesn't get funded in 18 days, I'll pitch in 10K just to push it over.
I'm bustin out the bubbly now!
It's a collectively shared dream of many of us. Let's just hope that they execute well with the funds and come out with new and interesting emulsions for us to burn!
Mackinaw
Think Different
The question now is not whether they’ll hit their goal, but by how much they’ll go over. I think something north of $275,000 is a possibility.
Jim B.
Jim B.
markwatts
Mark Watts
Ha, jkrumsick I was just thinking the same thing this morning! I am already in for a grand, we can split it 5 each..........but as Jim observes, I don't think it will be required.
I am staggered by the negative comments. I even read someone on the Kickstarter page complaining that the film on offer was too expensive!
There is no bad side to this.
I am staggered by the negative comments. I even read someone on the Kickstarter page complaining that the film on offer was too expensive!
There is no bad side to this.
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
No, but let's not encourage complacency either. I want to see this get up.So they raised 240K in 13 days and you think they won't get the last 10K even with 18 days to go?
An appropriate-scale factory for making film including film-base, chemicals and coating sounds like a very nice thing to have around as the big manufacturers gradually go out barse-ackwards because their production facilities can't scale down or they just don't see the effort of doing that as worth their while.
A spot of protection against an uncertain future for production of some types of film seems worth kicking the can for. I don't even use Super 8 or 16mm film, yet I'd hate to see it die.
...Mike
loupgarou
Member
Just put in for a 35 and 120 pack...hopefully we can get this across the line!
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
You could be part of the last $1,000
You could be part of the last $1,000
Nobody would know but you. But wouldn't it be satisfying?
4,395
Backers
$249,081
pledged of $250,000 goal
17
days to go
You could be part of the last $1,000
Nobody would know but you. But wouldn't it be satisfying?
4,395
Backers
$249,081
pledged of $250,000 goal
17
days to go
abo_1970
Member
Made my pledge for 2 rolls of 120.
tsiklonaut
Well-known
They are basically done, now's the question if it will stop or not! Not sure what they'll do with the extra 
Actually was hoping these guys would get some more encouraging, in some ways is more interesting project since there really isn't much fast ASA color films around lately (minus Portra 800 which has gotten very expensive), but their results are nowhere near the mark:
CineStill FILM 800
Margus
Actually was hoping these guys would get some more encouraging, in some ways is more interesting project since there really isn't much fast ASA color films around lately (minus Portra 800 which has gotten very expensive), but their results are nowhere near the mark:
CineStill FILM 800
Margus
ChrisLivsey
Veteran
They are basically done, now's the question if it will stop or not! Not sure what they'll do with the extra
Actually was hoping these guys would get some more encouraging, in some ways is more interesting project since there really isn't much fast ASA color films around lately (minus Portra 800 which has gotten very expensive), but their results are nowhere near the mark:
CineStill FILM 800
Margus
Having shot the 35mm version with associated highlight issues of coloured halos due to removal of the remjet I will not be shooting the 120 if it appears. 35mm rolls are a bit of fun and I have some left.

Cine Still C41 Film test no filter tungsten/strip lighting by Man with Red Eyes, on Flickr
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
I'm supporting the Cinestill guys as well, but somehow they just don't seem to have the same traction. I guess I understand why (they aren't actually producing film, just re-purposing it) yet I'd still like them to succeed. I suspect they won't, though, at least on their current uptake rate.They are basically done, now's the question if it will stop or not! Not sure what they'll do with the extra
Actually was hoping these guys would get some more encouraging, in some ways is more interesting project since there really isn't much fast ASA color films around lately (minus Portra 800 which has gotten very expensive), but their results are nowhere near the mark:
CineStill FILM 800
Margus
...Mike
Tijmendal
Young photog
400$ left. Great to see how steadily (and easily) they made it. Most of the time there's the early backers, after which it's quiet for 27 days and then in the last couple of days there's another wave of money incoming. Ferrania has just had a really steady flow, adding 15-20k$ every day after the initial bubble. They've got 17 days to go. I'm really curious to see where they'll end. I'm kinda hoping they'll end at 400.000$ which'll allow them to make a 800/1600 slide film (I've heard rumors...)
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
Goal Achieved!
Goal Achieved!
The project is now funded. A thing of wonderment and beauty.
4,409
Backers
$250,066
pledged of $250,000 goal
17
days to go
Manage Your Pledge
This project will be funded on Thu, Oct 30 2014 4:59 AM AEDT.
Goal Achieved!
The project is now funded. A thing of wonderment and beauty.
4,409
Backers
$250,066
pledged of $250,000 goal
17
days to go
Manage Your Pledge
This project will be funded on Thu, Oct 30 2014 4:59 AM AEDT.
Spanik
Well-known
Anything extra will be usefull to get those machines stored, re-haoused, overhauled, adjusted and running again while at the same time making sure that the people needed get at least some minimal pay. This is just what is needed to save them, now it only starts to make them useful again.
zauhar
Veteran
Nice to see that they made the goal, and with much time to spare.
Certainly indicates a healthy interest in film. The folks at Ilford should feel good about this, as Ferrania is keeping film production alive, while not in direct competition.
Kodak is not even paying attention, I am sure.
Certainly indicates a healthy interest in film. The folks at Ilford should feel good about this, as Ferrania is keeping film production alive, while not in direct competition.
Kodak is not even paying attention, I am sure.
andrea gazzoni
Newbie
now wouldn't it be great if the guys at Ilford gave us some more years of Ilfochrome? I suspect many between the 4400+ backers would like an analog alternative for printing this film...any idea on how to talk to Ilford about all of this?
ChrisLivsey
Veteran
Ilfochrome was made by Ilford Switzerland which is not the same as Ilford UK.
HARMAN technology Limited was formed in 2005 by 6 former managers of ILFORD Imaging UK Limited.The company trades as ILFORD PHOTO for the range of monochrome film, paper, and photo chemistry products.
The name HARMAN comes from Alfred Hugh Harman who founded the original ILFORD company in 1879.
HARMAN technology Limited was formed in 2005 by 6 former managers of ILFORD Imaging UK Limited.The company trades as ILFORD PHOTO for the range of monochrome film, paper, and photo chemistry products.
The name HARMAN comes from Alfred Hugh Harman who founded the original ILFORD company in 1879.
bluesun267
Well-known
This is great news! Barring total disaster, we will be seeing and hearing a lot more from Ferrania in the coming years.
And I second the comment that Kodak is probably not paying attention. Being both a still and cine user, I know there were several parties begging for just one more run of Ektachrome when it was axed, willing to buy whatever minimum necessary, in its entirety. The answer was a limp, disinterested "no". Same thing to others who wanted to continue buying slightly special, but current, cine film--something as simple as double-perf 16mm film which means virtually nothing to Kodak to produce--yet they turned down one company's order of $150K, forcing them to go elsewhere (probably digital). Though painful to say (and I will sorely miss Tri-X and Ektar), everything about Kodak's attitude spells "exit strategy".
And I second the comment that Kodak is probably not paying attention. Being both a still and cine user, I know there were several parties begging for just one more run of Ektachrome when it was axed, willing to buy whatever minimum necessary, in its entirety. The answer was a limp, disinterested "no". Same thing to others who wanted to continue buying slightly special, but current, cine film--something as simple as double-perf 16mm film which means virtually nothing to Kodak to produce--yet they turned down one company's order of $150K, forcing them to go elsewhere (probably digital). Though painful to say (and I will sorely miss Tri-X and Ektar), everything about Kodak's attitude spells "exit strategy".
ravilamir
Well-known
Congratulations to Nicola and all at Film Ferrania!
ruby.monkey
Veteran
Congratulations indeed. Shame it shows up in my backed projects list like so:

kickstarter by ruby.monkey, on Flickr

kickstarter by ruby.monkey, on Flickr
Scrambler
Well-known
Based on their current rewards Ferrania were planning for up to $500,000 from the kickstarter.
I expect they thought 8mm and 16mm would be more popular, but I think the most interesting thing at this point is that the collectors box has only sold 1/2 the allotted numbers. It's people planning to shoot their film that have bought it - surely a good sign for Ferrania's future.
I expect they thought 8mm and 16mm would be more popular, but I think the most interesting thing at this point is that the collectors box has only sold 1/2 the allotted numbers. It's people planning to shoot their film that have bought it - surely a good sign for Ferrania's future.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.