Mackinaw
Think Different
Not an April Fool's joke. Ferrania just revamped their website and will make an announcement tomorrow, April 2nd, about a "new product" they will soon make available. Looking at their home page, I noticed these boxes of 120 P30 scattered among the 35mm version. That's my guess as to their new product.

Jim B.

Jim B.
Retro-Grouch
Veteran
This would be great news. P30 is Very Nice Stuff!
markjwyatt
Well-known
Another rumor is they are introducing a 50 ISO Ortho film. I guess we find out tomorrow.
Coldkennels
Barnack-toting Brit.
That would be exciting.Another rumor is they are introducing a 50 ISO Ortho film. I guess we find out tomorrow.
I'm still waiting on the E6 film that the Kickstarter originally promised all those years ago. I think I've shot maybe two rolls of colour film in the last decade, but I'd break that trend if we got some fresh slide film out of Ferrania.
Evergreen States
Francine Pierre Saget (they/them)
Hell yeah. I'd love to try a roll in my Autocord now that I've gotten an Oleson microprism screen in it.
Freakscene
Obscure member
Hopefully this batch develops to a proper exposure-density curve so that darkroom printers can work with it.
Marty
Marty
Mackinaw
Think Different
As mentioned in post #3, Ferrania released a brand new B&W film, Ferrania Orto.
Retro-Grouch
Veteran
Unfortunately, I think that ship has sailed. But as a dedicated color reversal shooter, it sure would be nice to have more options!That would be exciting.
I'm still waiting on the E6 film that the Kickstarter originally promised all those years ago. I think I've shot maybe two rolls of colour film in the last decade, but I'd break that trend if we got some fresh slide film out of Ferrania.
qqphotos
Well-known
i've gotten a couple of rolls of 120 P30 and played with it a bit. It's been long enough since I experimented with it in 35mm that I don't remember if it was also like this, but I'm finding that despite their insistence that it be shot at box speed, it really feels like a much slower film. In either xtol or rodinal, areas that should be retaining significant shadow detail are absolutely clear film, and then beyond a certain point it becomes quite dense. I feel like exposing it at 25 or 32 and developing it for lower contrast might be worthwhile but I'm not sure how many rolls of it I want to go through figuring out its properties. As is it's an ok effect for when you want entirely black shadows and are scanning, but it would be a real bear for darkroom printing.
Mackinaw
Think Different
I've already shot several rolls of 120 P30. I shoot it as EI 25 and have processed in D96 1+1. An example, in direct sunlight.i've gotten a couple of rolls of 120 P30 and played with it a bit. It's been long enough since I experimented with it in 35mm that I don't remember if it was also like this, but I'm finding that despite their insistence that it be shot at box speed, it really feels like a much slower film. In either xtol or rodinal, areas that should be retaining significant shadow detail are absolutely clear film, and then beyond a certain point it becomes quite dense. I feel like exposing it at 25 or 32 and developing it for lower contrast might be worthwhile but I'm not sure how many rolls of it I want to go through figuring out its properties. As is it's an ok effect for when you want entirely black shadows and are scanning, but it would be a real bear for darkroom printing.

Jim B.
Godfrey
somewhat colored
Hmm. I still have a few rolls of P30 135-36. And I'm running low on 120 film ...
G
G
qqphotos
Well-known
Thanks for confirming - this looks great and much more like I'd expect from the descriptions of the film. Good shadow detail, highlight contrast retained, etc. I wonder why they insist on it being an ISO 80 film.I've already shot several rolls of 120 P30. I shoot it as EI 25 and have processed in D96 1+1. An example, in direct sunlight.
View attachment 4824412
Jim B.
Retro-Grouch
Veteran
Marketing! Think of shooting an ISO 25 film with, say, a 25A filter under cloudy conditions in a medium format camera whose max aperture is almost always no more than f/2.8 or f/3.5. Most shooters would not be shooting handheld at that point, which severely curtails the usefulness for some folks. ISO 80 just sounds more useful, and after all, higher/bigger/faster/etc. is always better from a marketing standpoint, right?Thanks for confirming - this looks great and much more like I'd expect from the descriptions of the film. Good shadow detail, highlight contrast retained, etc. I wonder why they insist on it being an ISO 80 film.
Mackinaw
Think Different
It was designed as a movie film, so maybe that's why they insist it's an 80 speed film. The key to taming the film's high contrast is to bombard the shadows with a lot of light, which is why I use EI 25.Thanks for confirming - this looks great and much more like I'd expect from the descriptions of the film. Good shadow detail, highlight contrast retained, etc. I wonder why they insist on it being an ISO 80 film.
Another from a recent roll of 120 P30. Rollieflex 6006, Distagon 50/4.

Jim B.
45govt
Established
Hello Jim B.
Those look great, what was the time you used on the D96
Thanks Don
Those look great, what was the time you used on the D96
Thanks Don
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.