rayfoxlee
Raymondo
Let me explain! For those of us that don't have a darkroom, scanned 35mm negs (eg. Nikon Coolscan) probably don't get the best out of the format and with the rise of the Fuji cameras, can it be argued that the quality from this new breed of camera makes film less relevant in terms of image quality?
Looking through the images and comments from the posts on the X100 and X Pro 1, these two deliver tremendous quality images and atmosphere in the right hands.
Perhaps my post processing of film images leaves something to be desired, but is film losing the battle on quality to the Fujis? How many of you have 'jumped ship' and not looked back?
Ray
Looking through the images and comments from the posts on the X100 and X Pro 1, these two deliver tremendous quality images and atmosphere in the right hands.
Perhaps my post processing of film images leaves something to be desired, but is film losing the battle on quality to the Fujis? How many of you have 'jumped ship' and not looked back?
Ray