Film Speed: indoors

Huck Finn

Well-known
Local time
12:10 PM
Joined
Apr 14, 2004
Messages
1,943
Location
Connecticut, USA
I'd like to shift the focus of the film speed thread to specifically talk about film speeds for indoors.

Does anyone have a film rated 800, 1600, or 3200 that you're happy with? I'm interested in both B/W & color.

I prefer not to shoot slower than 1/60 for hand held shots & not faster than f/2 & am looking for something for a wide range of purposes.

Thanks,
Huck
 
I've been using Fuji 1600 color negative for basketball games. In the newest high school gyms around here it enables me to shoot at 1/125@5.6. That works well with a 135mm lens.

-Paul
 
I have moved to Tri-X at either 1250 or 1600 which I can develop in Diafine. I would love to have a fast color film of quality that you don't have to worry about the temp of the lighting, but I haven't found one to my liking.

With the Tri-X I keep my yellow filter on the lens for an effective speed of 640ish or 800. I can keep at least a 1/30s speed like this, which I don't mind. You can drop the filter if you need a faster shutter. I have not done a lot with Delta 3200 or TMZ, but I have been casually looking for some DD-X which I think would be the best developer choice to push these films to 3200 or more if I want to go really fast. That will be my next experiment.
 
Same exact deal as pshinkaw - I used color Fuji 1600 to shoot basketball games. The results are perfectly acceptable - I've even gotten decent results from a college basketball practice where they had perhaps 1/3rd of the bank of lights on in a 10,000 seat arena.

I haven't really used it anywhere else, but I'll give it a shot over the long weekend coming up.
 
I was forced into pushing Delta-400 to an EI of 3200 once. I was shooting f1.7 @ 1/30. I developed in DD-X. I was surprised that it actually worked quite well.

Kent
 
Colour film, Fuji Superia XTRA 800. I pick up multi-packs of 3 or 6 at the local grocery chain for about CDN$3- per roll. I've been pushing HP5+ in Microphen for 800 iso, and I'll be playing with HP5+ & TriX in Diafine for 800-1250 iso.

I'll shot a couple of rolls of Neopan 1600 souped in Microphen and it's quite nice but it's about CDN$8- per roll.
 
For B&W, I highly recommend Fuji Neopan 1600. Since I do a lot of night/low-light shooting, it's the emulsion I use most often (if they made it in 120 format, I'd use even more). For C41, I recommend Fuji NPZ because of its ability to handle mixed lighting or, if you want to save some money, Fuji Press 800, which is similar to NPZ. I used to like Kodak's Supra 800, but their current Portra 800 (don't know if that's still the current designation) is OK, too. I've shot a few rolls of Fuji Superia 1600 & while it was surprisingly good compared to what I was expecting, IMHO, it's noticeably inferior to NPZ, even pushed NPZ (graininess, ability to handle different color temps, etc.) & only worth using in extreme situations.
 
I'll also recommend Fuji 1600 Superia Color film. As someone who tried 800 film 20 years ago (it looked like prints-on-sandpaper), I'm happily amazed at what the new 1600 looks like.
This was during our dark Northwest winter, in the dark woods.
 
B&W: Tri-X@1600 in Diafine
Color: Fuji Supermarket (aka Superia XTRA) 800

William
 
Mono: Delta 3200. True ISO (see the free ISO module in the Photo School on www.rogerandfrances.com) about twice that of Tri-X or even HP5 and maybe 50 per cent greater than Neopan 1600: about 1250 in DDX. It pushes well (for my taste) to EI 3200; 6400 and higher are only for when you have to. But then, 1600 is only 1/3 stop push in DDX, whereas Tri-X @ EI 1600 is around 1-1/2 stop push.

ISO 400 films usually look nasty to me beyond about EI 1000 but a great deal depends on your subject matter.

Cheers,

Roger
 
Huck Finn said:
Does anyone have a film rated 800, 1600, or 3200 that you're happy with? I'm interested in both B/W & color.

I prefer not to shoot slower than 1/60 for hand held shots & not faster than f/2 & am looking for something for a wide range of purposes.

I've been happy with the stock Fuji 800 and 1600. This shot here (interior of casino) was shot with Fuji 800, 1/60, auto exposure but smaller than f2 I'm sure:

http://www.letis.com/dmr/pics/vegas/vegas4/0729534-R1-004-0A.jpg

It was taken with the GIII. I've shot Fuji 1600 in the Pentax and I would like to recalibrate the GIII so I can easily use it as well. The jury is still out on that one. 🙂
 
Oh, one thing I forgot. Run, do not walk away from the Walgreens store brand 800 film! <_gag_> To say that it stinks is to compliment it! 🙁 I ran out of Fuji 800 on a recent shoot and bought a roll on a whim and I'm sorry I did. The difference between the Fuji shots and the Walgreens film shots were like night and day. Walgreens was much more contrasty, too grainy, and had very poor solids. 🙁
 
I like the dramatic 'film noir' look of Neopan 1600, but getting away with EI 1600 with this film is always a bit of a gamble, even with my favorite 'full film speed' developer, Calbe A49; I#d rather shoot NP1600 at EI 1000, if there is enough light.
If there isn't, I like to shoot TMax3200 at EI 3200, Calbe A49 1+1, 20 to 22 min. (20°C); it is grainy, sure, but I like the look.
I have seen nice results from Delta 3200 from other people, but it never worked for me - I always got mushy pics without good sharpness.

Roman
 
I think I have a different idea of what "indoors" may mean. Indoors during daytime, when daylight may come in, ISO 400 works reasonably well.

For daytime indoors, BW: Ilford XP2; Color: Fuji 400 or Press 800.
For nightime indoors, BW: Tri-X @ 1600 for Diafine dev; Color: Fuji Press 800 (I can hand-hold reasonably well at 1/4 sec. if I'm not too strained)

I never push; never ever (Diafine is effective push, but not in a conventional sense -- it's a compensating developer). Pull, maybe, sometimes.
 
Back
Top Bottom