horibilis
Member
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm
Digital does not replace film. Just look here for why a magazine like Arizona Highways simply does not accept images from digital cameras for publication since the quality is not good enough, even from 11 megapixel cameras, to print at 12 x 18."
Above paragraph from the above url. What do you think?
Dave D
Digital does not replace film. Just look here for why a magazine like Arizona Highways simply does not accept images from digital cameras for publication since the quality is not good enough, even from 11 megapixel cameras, to print at 12 x 18."
Above paragraph from the above url. What do you think?
Dave D
cmedin
Well-known
Well, we certainly haven't discussed this topic in a while! 
NickTrop
Veteran
Oh no. Not this time. I ain't gettin' suckered into any more of these threads. Viva la difference (even though film is better 
Kim Coxon
Moderator
I wonder why this is in the Konica forum and why the same tired old question comes up again.
Kim
Kim
horibilis said:What do you think?
Dave D
ChrisN
Striving
Also from the same site:
"While occasionally inspired by actual products or experiences, this site is entirely a work of fiction. It's a joke! Any resemblance to any actual people, places, products or anything is purely coincidental. This site is private and provided only for the entertainment of my personal friends and myself."
"While occasionally inspired by actual products or experiences, this site is entirely a work of fiction. It's a joke! Any resemblance to any actual people, places, products or anything is purely coincidental. This site is private and provided only for the entertainment of my personal friends and myself."
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
That was my question. While I'd love a digital Hexar RF, the only ones I'm aware of all take film. Not that there's anything wrong with that.Kim Coxon said:I wonder why this is in the Konica forum
...Mike
Al Patterson
Ferroequinologist
As far as Konica is concerned, film wins as there isn't a digital Konica.
Unless you count the Sony...
(Do we NEED to concurrent film vs. digial threads???)
Unless you count the Sony...
(Do we NEED to concurrent film vs. digial threads???)
wgerrard
Veteran
Wrong forum, but...
Much of the 'film lives' argument seems to focus on the artistic and esthetic advantages of film. I don't think that's enough to save film. Most film buyers don't know, and can't see, the difference. Even if they can, digital's speed and integration with the rest of their lives takes precedence.
Besides, digital will just get better, especially regarding resolution. Film won't.
Film sales will continue to decrease. Kodak and Fuji will drop it. Maybe when someone else buys them. Some folks will try homebrew or artisan film production. A few will make money. Eventually, only True Believers will use film, and they'll lose money doing it.
Much of the 'film lives' argument seems to focus on the artistic and esthetic advantages of film. I don't think that's enough to save film. Most film buyers don't know, and can't see, the difference. Even if they can, digital's speed and integration with the rest of their lives takes precedence.
Besides, digital will just get better, especially regarding resolution. Film won't.
Film sales will continue to decrease. Kodak and Fuji will drop it. Maybe when someone else buys them. Some folks will try homebrew or artisan film production. A few will make money. Eventually, only True Believers will use film, and they'll lose money doing it.
aad
Not so new now.
New here, right?
Well, my oldest film camera that I use is 70 years old and my oldest DSLR is only 15 years old. I don't think the DSLR will make it to 70. I've had to take it apart a couple of times already. And if the hard drive goes in it, I've only got one spare. Finding 80MByte 2.5" SCSI notebook drives is really hard these days. Finding 35mm film is much easier. Writing the raw convertor for the DSLR wasn't too bad, even though it is not documented. Yup, in the film vs digital one-on-one battle, the film camera will outlast every one.
wgerrard
Veteran
Brian, even if your DSLR makes it to 70, odds are it won't know how to talk with anything else. Digital products are intended to be trashed, not repaired. It's the nature of the beast.
Your film cameras, and mine, will eventually break and we won't be able to get them repaired. That's what spells the commercial demise of film.
Meanwhile, digital will keep improving. Prices won't change much. But,capabilities will.
Your film cameras, and mine, will eventually break and we won't be able to get them repaired. That's what spells the commercial demise of film.
Meanwhile, digital will keep improving. Prices won't change much. But,capabilities will.
Anupam
Well-known
chikne
Well-known
horibilis said:Film VS Digital
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
RObert Budding
D'oh!
wgerrard said:Film sales will continue to decrease. Kodak and Fuji will drop it. Maybe when someone else buys them. Some folks will try homebrew or artisan film production. A few will make money. Eventually, only True Believers will use film, and they'll lose money doing it.
The same thing is happening with restaurants. McDonalds, Burger King, and Wendy's are getting bigger and bigger. Fine dining is a thing of the past. By 2020 all take out meals will originate with the "big three."
BillP
Rangefinder General
RObert Budding said:The same thing is happening with restaurants. McDonalds, Burger King, and Wendy's are getting bigger and bigger. Fine dining is a thing of the past. By 2020 all take out meals will originate with the "big three."
...I cannot believe you just used "take out" and "fine dining" in the same sentence...
Regards,
Bill
Kim Coxon
Moderator
What was that film where Sly was a policeman taken out of deep freeze to catch a criminal and the finest restaurant in town was Taco Bell's?
Kim
Kim
chikne
Well-known
I shall add, Ctrl c, Ctrl v.
wgerrard
Veteran
RObert Budding said:The same thing is happening with restaurants. McDonalds, Burger King, and Wendy's are getting bigger and bigger. Fine dining is a thing of the past. By 2020 all take out meals will originate with the "big three."
Nah. The food in those joints isn't getting any better. I still eat pretty well when I go out.
The resolution offered by digital will just keep improving, as will the in-camera processing. The integration of digital images with the rest of our lives will only increase. You'll never get the quality of a Leica and a Leica lens from a cellphone camera, but few will care except artistes, and not enough of them will be around to support film. Meanwhile, you'll need a lab and a print the size of a township to tell the difference between a Leica film camera and a $400 digital.
Last edited:
Al Patterson
Ferroequinologist
RObert Budding said:The same thing is happening with restaurants. McDonalds, Burger King, and Wendy's are getting bigger and bigger. Fine dining is a thing of the past. By 2020 all take out meals will originate with the "big three."
So what will I eat as I don't eat at any of those garbage dumps. Without a decent Chinese or Mexican place, I'll starve. And where will I get my Korean BBQ?
JeffGreene
(@)^(@)
No more film versus digital threads!! Pleeeeze! Each to his own!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.