Okay, I watched this movie and was very disappointed on many levels...story-line, portrayal of the photographer, screen writing, technical aspects, treatment of women, acting and the movie's ending...
If I were to watch this again I'd count the number of shots taken on that infamous roll of film...and I'd also like to know what film he was using to enlarge the image to the size he had...and not only that to enlarge it again to the same size using only a tiny portion of that 35mm frame...then to enlarge it even more he uses a 4x5 camera, haphazardly placing two lights and guessing at the exposure, then prints that to find the body...
Someone please explain to me the ending with the Mimes playing tennis...I would have preferred him walking through the park by himself with the camera zooming out and somewhere way off frame show me the dead body...that would have made more sense...
I would also like to know how the 1966 public reacted to the scene of the two young women who came over to be photographed and ended up getting naked on the backdrop paper...that had to be pretty risky for that time...
He should have photographed Vanessa Redgrave when she came for the film...then end the film there...
What I found funny was the review the Host had of the movie when it was over...
