noimmunity
scratch my niche
Some very interesting comments and experience being shared here. Thank you. I think this may help me improve my technique.
At the time, the only solution I could find was to change the angle or position from which I was composing my shots. Various attempts to master exposure, including bracketing, compensation, and manual setting, didn't work. BTW, although the lighting was intense, it wasn't particularly fast-paced and variable, either. When positioned correctly, I got a lot of excellent stage shots that were really satisfying. But compared to another guy who was working the event, too, like me, yet was equipped with a D700 (and shooting from essentially the same position), the problems I had with sensor overload occupied a greater percentage of the total shots. When we compared results, it didn't look to either of us like it was down to just overexposure.
At the time, the only solution I could find was to change the angle or position from which I was composing my shots. Various attempts to master exposure, including bracketing, compensation, and manual setting, didn't work. BTW, although the lighting was intense, it wasn't particularly fast-paced and variable, either. When positioned correctly, I got a lot of excellent stage shots that were really satisfying. But compared to another guy who was working the event, too, like me, yet was equipped with a D700 (and shooting from essentially the same position), the problems I had with sensor overload occupied a greater percentage of the total shots. When we compared results, it didn't look to either of us like it was down to just overexposure.
furcafe
Veteran
Aside from technique, there are some differences between the X-Pro1 & D700 as far as the camera's metering bias/algorithms, not to mention the sensors. Then there's the fact that even assuming you were both shooting w/lenses that had the same field of view, the focal length of your X-Pro1 lens would be shorter (not sure whether this means the lens would gather more light--I'll let 1 of the optical tech types weigh in).
To draw from my own experience again, I shot a show using the X-Pro1 + 18/2 & a D700 + 28/1.4 AF-D (I've been trying to decide whether to ditch the D700). Shooting the same scene with both cameras set to the same ISO, metering mode, & exposure settings (aperture priority @ f/2), the D700 shots tended to be about a stop or 2 darker. You easily can see the difference in my post in this thread: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1856824&postcount=71
To draw from my own experience again, I shot a show using the X-Pro1 + 18/2 & a D700 + 28/1.4 AF-D (I've been trying to decide whether to ditch the D700). Shooting the same scene with both cameras set to the same ISO, metering mode, & exposure settings (aperture priority @ f/2), the D700 shots tended to be about a stop or 2 darker. You easily can see the difference in my post in this thread: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1856824&postcount=71
Some very interesting comments and experience being shared here. Thank you. I think this may help me improve my technique.
At the time, the only solution I could find was to change the angle or position from which I was composing my shots. Various attempts to master exposure, including bracketing, compensation, and manual setting, didn't work. BTW, although the lighting was intense, it wasn't particularly fast-paced and variable, either. When positioned correctly, I got a lot of excellent stage shots that were really satisfying. But compared to another guy who was working the event, too, like me, yet was equipped with a D700 (and shooting from essentially the same position), the problems I had with sensor overload occupied a greater percentage of the total shots. When we compared results, it didn't look to either of us like it was down to just overexposure.