Focomat condenser question

Did you find the Valoy unusable with the Philips bulb due to uneven illumination?

In fact I used it for quite some time. With dense, contrasty negatives there was not much of a problem; but thin, soft negatives where difficult. They became too dark in the center or too light in the corners (I always print the whole negative, I never crop.)

Erik.
 
The good news: Dr. Fisher since last year is making the short versions again. For sure in 150 watt and I imagine also in 75 watt. They are phasing out the long neck versions, which I believe to be a good choice as the short neck bulbs should work in all enlargers.

This is indeed good news. In the Focomats you can raise or lower the bulb; in the Valoy II you cannot. I hope that for the users of the Valoy II the bulbs are short enough now; otherwise they can look for a Focomat Ic. These are incredibly low priced today, they cost less than a box of 100 sheets of ADOX MCC 110 18x24cm paper (in The Netherlands that is).

Erik.
 
This is indeed good news. In the Focomats you can raise or lower the bulb; in the Valoy II you cannot. I hope that for the users of the Valoy II the bulbs are short enough now. Erik.

Yes, these bulbs are fine in the Valoy II. I made a test printing one negative on both the 1c and the Valoy II on 50X60 paper. Everything totally fine with regards to even illumination.

Small difference in the contrast and one large difference: the 1c print needed 70 seconds exposure, the Valoy II print 50 seconds. This could be because of a couple of reasons, or a combination. First, the bulb in the Valoy II sits closer to the negative and second, the new smaller Fisher bulbs do not look as white opal as the ones I am used to. Also the different condensers may play a role . . .

Whichever it is, the prints are both fine and A prints.

ps I have modified a Valoy II to reach that size.
ps attached both Fisher bulbs, short and long . . .
 

Attachments

  • Opal bulbs short & long.jpg
    Opal bulbs short & long.jpg
    153.1 KB · Views: 0
Yes, these bulbs are fine in the Valoy II. I made a test printing one negative on both the 1c and the Valoy II on 50X60 paper. Everything totally fine with regards to even illumination.

Small difference in the contrast and one large difference: the 1c print needed 70 seconds exposure, the Valoy II print 50 seconds. This could be because of a couple of reasons, or a combination. First, the bulb in the Valoy II sits closer to the negative and second, the new smaller Fisher bulbs do not look as white opal as the ones I am used to. Also the different condensers may play a role . . .

Whichever it is, the prints are both fine and A prints.

ps I have modified a Valoy II to reach that size.
ps attached both Fisher bulbs, short and long . . .

Yes, looks great, I too have a Valoy II with a looong column. How can I get one of those lamps?

Erik.
 
Yes, looks great, I too have a Valoy II with a looong column. How can I get one of those lamps?

Erik.

I sent an email to Dr Fischer today and received a reply asking for more details re the bulb. I did explain the application, wattage and size but maybe a photo of the bulb above will be more clarification. They also asked for my company details so maybe they are wholesale only.
 
Been searching in my emails with a friend in Germany who got some for me, and in emails with Fisher. Not very successful yet.

But I think I was premature to say you can order directly from Fisher. I have asked the friend where he got them . . .

Erik, Foto den Boer can surely order them for you . . .
 
The one on the left in my picture of a previous post is short and 150 watt !

Perhaps the different orange instead-of-dark-blue lettering indicates the last smaller versions
 
Back
Top Bottom