xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
I have tried this film and it is too not bad, HP 5+ and Tri X seems better though,
the recommended 13 minutes in D 76 at 20 deg. C development in D76 1:1 seems a tad to long for this Foma film.
I will give it 11.5 minutes next time , so not to block the highlights.
any recommended dev. time in Rodinal at 1:50 dilution?
the recommended 13 minutes in D 76 at 20 deg. C development in D76 1:1 seems a tad to long for this Foma film.
I will give it 11.5 minutes next time , so not to block the highlights.
any recommended dev. time in Rodinal at 1:50 dilution?
Xmas
Veteran
Xray
Thanks, but were your shadows ok?
noel
Thanks, but were your shadows ok?
noel
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
the shadows were ok, not as nice as I get with HP 5+ , but I suspect the optimistic 400 ASA rating of this film is actually less than its box rating.
I will shoot some at 200 ASA and give it less time in D76 1:1.
this might be more to my liking.
I will shoot some at 200 ASA and give it less time in D76 1:1.
this might be more to my liking.
T
Todd.Hanz
Guest
Fomapan 400 D-76 1+1 EI 200 8-9 min 20C
Fomapan 400 D-76 stock EI 400 7-10 min 20C
Fomapan 400 D-76 1+1 EI 400 10 min 20C
Fomapan 400 D-76 1+1 EI 400 13 min 20C
the above times are off of the "Massive dev chart"
YMMV depending on the usual variables (your agitation techniques, temps, exposure techniques, etc.)
BTW, I've never used Foma.
Todd
Fomapan 400 D-76 stock EI 400 7-10 min 20C
Fomapan 400 D-76 1+1 EI 400 10 min 20C
Fomapan 400 D-76 1+1 EI 400 13 min 20C
the above times are off of the "Massive dev chart"
YMMV depending on the usual variables (your agitation techniques, temps, exposure techniques, etc.)
BTW, I've never used Foma.
Todd
DxPhoto
Established
Hi,
I just tried it in rodinal (1+50). Not as nice as tri-x in rodinal though. The resolution is not as good as tri-x.
Is it possible for you to post a hi-res scan? Just a 100% crop. I am putting the 100% crop I got here. I shot it as 320, in Bessa R. scanned with canon 8400 flatbed, at 2400DPI.
http://picasaweb.google.com/dxphoto/FOMA/photo#5008998762423490018
download the original size
http://lh4.google.com/image/dxphoto.../CjJXtZ1hr_I/foma400_rodinal_1_50.jpg?imgdl=1
I just tried it in rodinal (1+50). Not as nice as tri-x in rodinal though. The resolution is not as good as tri-x.
Is it possible for you to post a hi-res scan? Just a 100% crop. I am putting the 100% crop I got here. I shot it as 320, in Bessa R. scanned with canon 8400 flatbed, at 2400DPI.
http://picasaweb.google.com/dxphoto/FOMA/photo#5008998762423490018
download the original size
http://lh4.google.com/image/dxphoto.../CjJXtZ1hr_I/foma400_rodinal_1_50.jpg?imgdl=1
Last edited:
DxPhoto
Established
and the grain responded to my scanner close to tri-x in rodinal(1+50). So i really want to know how it looks on your side. Thanks.
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
DxPhoto
Established
Thanks. It looks like d76 does yield better result than Rodinal.
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
I will try this film in Rodinal, just out of curiousity.
Like I said before, in D-76 it would benefit with a little less time in the developer.
Like I said before, in D-76 it would benefit with a little less time in the developer.
DxPhoto
Established
Cool, let us know what you get. Honestly I don't think its a bad film at all (of coz, it's not tri-x).xayraa33 said:I will try this film in Rodinal, just out of curiousity.
Like I said before, in D-76 it would benefit with a little less time in the developer.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.