peterm1
Veteran
I used a 1Ds for ten years as my studio camera (and still have it) but upgraded to a Nikon D3X. These bodies are certainly large, heavy, and reassuring to handle. I would not, however, take one on vacation. 🙂 My choice for a pro-grade film camera is the Contax RTS III which also has a vertical grip and 5fps motor drive integrated—not bad for 1990.
I agree about not taking them on vacation. I do not have pro bodies but I use a D700 with pro lenses and while its less than a D3 etc its just got too heavy for long trips. Or I have got older. One or the other. Still I love to use it and the lenses around my home city but lugging 10 kilos of assorted camera and lenses on holidays and then around a foreign city is no joke. I always have to come back and book into my physiotherapist for 3 months afterwards.
For this reason I recently bought a second hand Sony NEX 7 which admittedly only has an APS sized sensor but has two times the megapixel count of my Nikon and much the same dynamic range if not better. When matched with my Leica M lenses it makes a nice light camera kit for holidays.
Having said all of that the nice feeling of using really top grade kit is unsurpassed. I must admit that when I bought my Leica M8 it was off putting as my primary gripe was that Leica film Ms felt every bit the pro camera while the digital M felt like a cheaper knock off especially in how it "felt" in use - the sound, the shutter feel etc. This after all is a prime reason for anteing up all that extra cash. Same for those who buy a BMW or Mercedes often. Its not so much the status symbol as the way they feel.