Forum Rules

backalley photo said:
welcome to your new home roger!
Click to expand...

Thanks!

>> don't think we ever did get an answer to the size question.

Er, does anybody know? Who would we ask? Since panoramas have such long thin aspect ratios, they really need to be quite wide--preferably 1200 pixels--to have a reasonable depth. Or vice versa (I like taking them in portrait mode, too!)

>> rff is a pretty good place to hang out, lots of good people, civil & respectful interaction and we even laugh a bit, with each other.

Sounds like my kinda place...

Roger
 
Thanks...

Thanks...

Doug said:
Roger, welcome to RFForum; delighted to see you here! I've enjoyed your good-humored, well-reasoned, and informed posts in CVUG, RF list, and the lens list.

If Bessa-L pics qualify here, then I'd say acceptance is pretty broad. Seems to me anything focusing on a ground glass isn't so well-favored, but I think the idea is to be more inclusive than exclusive. Then there's the Northwest (scenery) Gallery that's open to even those images.

Hope you'll enjoy the forum... :)
Click to expand...

Thanks for the welcome, Doug. Are you sure you have the right Roger? {grin}

Sounds good! I'll just post what seems best from my point of view and accept any guidance that results. I sure hope non SLR panoramas are OK. And that 1,200 pixel widths are OK.

I'm sure I'll enjoy it! Thanks again.

Roger
 
roger,
jorge is the big cheese around here, it's his forum. maybe send him a private messege and ask about the size.

joe
 
Size problem

Size problem

Joe, I find it's not critical... the site just automatically resizes anything over its limit. I (naughtily) sent a 3,500 x 1,000 image and it eventually appeared about 1,000 pixels wide, and slightly "soft." One that was 800 wide stayed the same size. I'll try sticking to 1,200 pixels. If they survive unchanged, I'll be home and dry...

Roger
 
Thanks for pixel limit information

Thanks for pixel limit information

Thanks, Jorge. That's really quite generous. It will allow me to show my panoramas to much better advantage than under the 800 pixel limit where I usually hang out.

Roger
 
Jorge, thanks for facilitating this global forum. Since joining a couple of months ago I have found that people are generous with their assistance, and also their opinions to the point of making a point without labouring it. It has been useful from the perspective of disease diagnosis as well, inasmuch as I previously thought that 'gas' was not referred to in polite company, but now know that it is a terminal condition. Thanks for hosting an oasis.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom