Canyongazer
Canyongazer
Shot with the GSW690 for seven or eight years and liked it very much. Sold it to get the Mamiya 7ll w/ three lenses.
Mamiya was and is excellent but probably should have kept the Fuji to go along with it. IMO, the 28mm angle of view works very well with the 2:3 aspect ratio.
The lens is better than good.
I had zero complaints about the camera.
I paid $1,200 for it and used to consider it a $900 lens welded to a $300 body, a body that, while not elegant, is quite adequate for the job at hand.
Mamiya was and is excellent but probably should have kept the Fuji to go along with it. IMO, the 28mm angle of view works very well with the 2:3 aspect ratio.
The lens is better than good.
I had zero complaints about the camera.
I paid $1,200 for it and used to consider it a $900 lens welded to a $300 body, a body that, while not elegant, is quite adequate for the job at hand.
Texsport
Well-known
I've used the older, lens interchangeable 670 and 690 Fujicas a lot. Could never see the advantage of the later fixed lens models when you could have 50, 65, 100, 150, and 180mm lenses + a close up accessory lens.
The 100/3.5AE, 65/3.5, and 50 are my most frequent users. 21mm equivalent in 135 terms makes the Fuji 50 quite unique for close and wide on 6X9 format.
Texsport
The 100/3.5AE, 65/3.5, and 50 are my most frequent users. 21mm equivalent in 135 terms makes the Fuji 50 quite unique for close and wide on 6X9 format.
Texsport
Prest_400
Multiformat
Is it any other differences than the aspect ratio?
Shouldn't the GW670 be the "best" when comes to large apertures? I mean it's the same 90/3.5 lens on all three, isn't it?
Also i prefer the fuji lensed to the mamiya 7 lenses, i like the less contrasty look and i prefer the bokeh on fuji.
Well, the lenses are the same across the GW series, though all cover 6x9 and the GW670-680 models have a different film gate that masks down. That should help reducing vignetting and extreme corner problems.
The lens design for the 90mm IMO is peculiar, IIRC it is a 5 element in 5 group lens. The schematic can be found in some advertising leaflet.
EdSawyer
Established
I believe the 90/3.5 is a 5 element, 4-group design. It's a nice lens, good bokeh, I liked it. the GSW lens is a 6-element symmetrical lens design with 4 groups. If anything the GSW 65mm is sharper than the 90, but both are really superb.
Calzone
Gear Whore #1
I've used the older, lens interchangeable 670 and 690 Fujicas a lot. Could never see the advantage of the later fixed lens models when you could have 50, 65, 100, 150, and 180mm lenses + a close up accessory lens.
The 100/3.5AE, 65/3.5, and 50 are my most frequent users. 21mm equivalent in 135 terms makes the Fuji 50 quite unique for close and wide on 6X9 format.
Texsport
Plus one with above.
I also deem the 100/3.5 the "King Of The Tessars." 4 element in 3 groups. I love this lens and the way it renders.
Very durable construction and for no money. Very basic cameras and built for commercial use.
I own a GL690 and a GM670; the 65/8.0; the 100/3.5; the 100/3.5AE; and the 150/5.6. With two bodies and just three lenses I can get 6 different FOV's. I suggest the later GL690 over the G690BL due to the higher maginification on the newer bodies.
Cal
Share: