maddoc
... likes film again.
I wonder if there will be a proper pack-film holder for the wide format of this film to be used with a 4x5 camera ...
Solinar
Analog Preferred
I've seen the line up of plastic Fujifilm cameras at my local camera shop. On two occasions I saw potential customer looking them over.
Sure wish that Fujifilm could make a camera that would support their FP-100C and now discontinued FP-3000B films.
Best Regards from:
Sure wish that Fujifilm could make a camera that would support their FP-100C and now discontinued FP-3000B films.
Best Regards from:
Eric T
Well-known
Gary,
I checked it carefully (and as others have said), the new Wide 300 camera uses the same film as the Wide 210. Nice size prints.
I checked it carefully (and as others have said), the new Wide 300 camera uses the same film as the Wide 210. Nice size prints.
GaryLH
Veteran
Thanks Eric
Gary
Gary
Godfrey
somewhat colored
You're probably right ... I was just running the numbers based on the article's $32/pack quote.
G
GaryLH
Veteran
I like them Andy. But I do agree the 210 looks better than the 300.
Gary
Gary
Godfrey
somewhat colored
I was thinking... Use my flat bed Epson 750 flatbed scanner on the nice result from this
The biggest issue is holding the image just off the glass to prevent Newton rings. I have a jig that Impossible sells to do this, but it's not perfect. I have an idea to make a better one.
Oh yeah: I have an ancient Epson 2450 which I use to scan my Polaroids. I don't even scan at max resolution, I set it to 1200 ppi. That works very well.
G
GaryLH
Veteran
Thanks Godfrey
Gary
Gary
mooge
Well-known
... the moment I realized that Instax Wide is bigger than FP-100c
hey, maybe I should design a graflok instax wide back so I can shoot this on my Sinar... hmm...
hey, maybe I should design a graflok instax wide back so I can shoot this on my Sinar... hmm...
f16sunshine
Moderator
Oh man... If fuji would release a back for this film.
Why not fuji? It's a lo-tech no brainer to pump your film sales.
Just design it and farm it out to China for manufacture.
See how simple.. I did it on the bus
GaryLH
Veteran
Oh man... If fuji would release a back for this film.
Why not fuji? It's a lo-tech no brainer to pump your film sales.
Just design it and farm it out to China for manufacture.
See how simple.. I did it on the bus
Actually.. Anyone got a 3d printer to make a back
Gary
f16sunshine
Moderator
Yeah but... Wouldn't a mass produced perfectly centered, power fed back be sweet!
A motorized dark slide that was controlled by a "T" switch.
Press the button and the dark slide opens.. press again and it closes and then ejects the exposed frame through the rollers.
Just like a "T"setting on a shutter.
No more tugging on paper tabs that occasionally fail and take your film and money down with them !
Yeah... just dreaming. I'll try a 210 or mini.
A motorized dark slide that was controlled by a "T" switch.
Press the button and the dark slide opens.. press again and it closes and then ejects the exposed frame through the rollers.
Just like a "T"setting on a shutter.
No more tugging on paper tabs that occasionally fail and take your film and money down with them !
Yeah... just dreaming. I'll try a 210 or mini.
shortstop
Well-known
Nothing new. My Instax 100 gives images 62x100 mm without considering the white border.
B-9
Devin Bro
These are horrible cameras for serious picture taking, I have a small thread on the 210 in the Polaroid/Lomo sub forum.
My 210 pooped out after 2 cassettes, the last pack I had to unload and reset the pack (along with multiple attempts to expose) the last 6-7 shots to get the camera to spit them out.
Now it rots in my junk bin. I still do really like the format, the cameras are just horrid.
My 210 pooped out after 2 cassettes, the last pack I had to unload and reset the pack (along with multiple attempts to expose) the last 6-7 shots to get the camera to spit them out.
Now it rots in my junk bin. I still do really like the format, the cameras are just horrid.
B-9
Devin Bro
Andy, doesn't Lomo have a manually operated Instax back for their Diana and LCA cameras?
If I was looking to do this again, I would have spent a few more $ on one of those Diana F+ Instant kits. Better VF, better exposure control, maybe a small drop in IQ, but no electronic malfunctions or motor jams. I also have a soft spot for crapy old toy cameras, which is proly why I bought the Fuji 210 POS to begin with
If I was looking to do this again, I would have spent a few more $ on one of those Diana F+ Instant kits. Better VF, better exposure control, maybe a small drop in IQ, but no electronic malfunctions or motor jams. I also have a soft spot for crapy old toy cameras, which is proly why I bought the Fuji 210 POS to begin with
taemo
eat sleep shoot
yes, it's the only thing I really want
well also maybe B mode and tripod socket on the instax wide camera
I taped instax wide film on 4x5 backs and did some test shots though
graywolf
Well-known
Well, the Mamiya Universal Press took a Polaroid back had had a 100mm f/2.8 lens that gave full coverage. I sure miss mine. One of my all time favorite cameras.
The 100mm f/3.5 had dark corners on Polaroid.