Fuji Superia 400 vs Fuji Professional PRO400H

[rayfoxlee]

Have any RFF members carried out any comparisons tests between these films, please? Sharpness, colour accuracy, grain, colour saturation, subject suitability are some of the areas of interest. I scan with a Nikon Coolscan V ED.

Thanks all!

Ray

 

[btgc]

In my limited experience Superia 400 is more contrasty while 400H is saturated, but contrast is rather balanced. I do not shoot too much portraits, though 400H renders faces without excessive red found in Superia 400.

In Superia line I prefer Superia Reala 100 (fine, slow film) and plain Superia 200 (nice slow film, cheaper than Reala) and 800. Not that Superia 400 is particularly bad, I just go either slow or fast. Superia 100 I didn't like compared to ISO200 variety.