Out to Lunch
Ventor
I'm surprised no one has mentioned it as of yet: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/videos/photography/fujifilm-xt5-30mm-macro-lens Cheers, OtL
I am a Fuji fan, but I am no longer excited by SLR shaped mirrorless cameras.
mrtoml
Mancunian
I traded in my X-T2 and got an X-H2. So far I am very happy with it. It is not a great adjustment to move from the X-T style dials to using the top screen although I do miss the exposure compensation dial sometimes. A think a lot of people held off the X-H2 hoping the X-T5 would be a more old school high megapixel alternative which it seems it is. I would personally like an X-Pro style camera with the 40MP sensor which I guess we may see next year.
The bigger concerns seem to be whther the older lenses are good enough for a 40MP APS-C sensor.
The bigger concerns seem to be whther the older lenses are good enough for a 40MP APS-C sensor.
The bigger concerns seem to be whther the older lenses are good enough for a 40MP APS-C sensor.
They will be perfectly fine.
FrozenInTime
Well-known
Now they have the X-H2 and X-T5 out of the way, they can work on getting 40 Mpixels, IBIS and the three way tilt LCD into the X-Pro4 and X-100VI ; that's when things will get really interesting.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
I'm surprised no one has mentioned it as of yet: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/videos/photography/fujifilm-xt5-30mm-macro-lens Cheers, OtL
It is eclipsed by X-H2.
I am interested in the 30mm 2.8 Macro though. I'm not into insects and flowers, but I think I can use it foe other things. Plus, I like lenses between 40-55mm a lot.
Disappointed_Horse
Well-known
The X-T5 is one of the rare digital cameras that is not bigger, heavier, and more expensive than its predecessor. I find it very appealing—if I was in the market for a camera in this price range, I think it would be my first choice.
Yokosuka Mike
Abstract Clarity
I am interested in the 30mm 2.8 Macro though. I'm not into insects and flowers, but I think I can use it foe other things. Plus, I like lenses between 40-55mm a lot.
I'm interested in this lens too. A small macro on my X-E4 would be useful for traveling. At least that's how I'm going to justify buying it.
Mike
aizan
Veteran
It's a good looking camera, but I'll hold out to see if the X-Pro4 has a tilting LCD like that, and a dual magnification viewfinder for 18mm lenses.
gavinlg
Veteran
The X-T series always seems a little unexciting in specs but is an amazing camera in use. Glad they went smaller and more photo centric with this one.
Pál_K
Cameras. I has it.
Not a bad price for what you get. I wish it had the control ergonomics of the wonderful X100V.
Out to Lunch
Ventor
I'll stick with the X-Pro1 for B&W, and with my Leica SL2-S for anything else. I've used the X-H1 and a variety of Fuji lenses for some years and loved them. This said I am surprised by their steep depreciation in the second-hand market. Cheers, OtL
I'll stick with the X-Pro1 for B&W, and with my Leica SL2-S for anything else. I've used the X-H1 and a variety of Fuji lenses for some years and loved them. This said I am surprised by their steep depreciation in the second-hand market. Cheers, OtL
Why would you be surprised? Anything digital not made by Leica depreciates quickly in the used market.
Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
I appear to be in a significant minority, but I really like the rear screen layout on the X-T4. I like being able to flip the screen over so that no screen is seen on the back. It then feels more like my old Nikon SLR film gear. I turn the screen outward only when I need to modify the operational settings, which is rarely.
Evergreen States
Francine Pierre Saget (they/them)
Looks like an all-around great camera. I'm not in the market, but I hope the people who buy it will be happy and get to make great pictures with it!
BWF
Established
Does the bump in megapixels reduce low light performance?
Out to Lunch
Ventor
gavinlg
Veteran
Does the bump in megapixels reduce low light performance?
Nope, actually I think the 40mp sensor is better in high ISO performance than the old 26mp one. (I've tested them)
BWF
Established
Nope, actually I think the 40mp sensor is better in high ISO performance than the old 26mp one. (I've tested them)
Fascinating. This makes it even more intriguing. Thanks.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.