Hmm, these pretty much sound like the basic principals of any photography; I guess the 8mm is just a bit more unforgiving when you don't observe them. It seems to me that the more extreme the lens, at either end, the more difficult a taskmaster it becomes!Hello DownUnder! Thank you for taking the time to look at all these images and for leaving some positive feedback.
What I can say in response is that the XF 8mm f3.5 lens is a challenge for me; it’s unlike any other lens that I own. Sometimes I’ll go out with it and I’ll have a great day; everything will work out better than expected. I’ll get cocky and overconfident, I’ll start to think that I’ve got this lens mastered! Then I’ll go out on another day with it and it’ll be a disaster; all my images will suck!
Some things that I think I’ve learned about this lens so far:
Content and composition are critical. This lens is not suited for everything. It only works in certain situations. Where one stands in relation to the subject/object/point-of-view is so important.
“No when to hold them and know when to fold them”, if the shot doesn't look good don’t force it; it wasn’t meant to be; best to move on or try a different lens.
Like all photography, light is critical. I think even more-so with this lens. This lens seems to thrive in dark moody areas and falls apart in bright light. Dimly lit closed in spaces work well for me.
Lastly, a little good luck goes a long way. 🙂
Lastly, lastly… this lens is a lot of fun and I’m glad I bought it. I haven't mastered it yet and maybe I never will, however, the journey is all that really matters to me and this journey has been some terrific fun so far!
All the best,
Mike
P.S. How’s that for rambling on and probably over-stating the obvious!
Hmm, these pretty much sound like the basic principals of any photography; I guess the 8mm is just a bit more unforgiving when you don't observe them. It seems to me that the more extreme the lens, at either end, the more difficult a taskmaster it becomes!
Mea culpa, mea culpa! I fancy myself a member of the grammar police as well, so I'm ashamed to have let this happen. I will now go read Finnegan's Wake in one sitting, as penance.Principals or principles?? Never mind, it's the schoolteacher in me. A long time ago I did teach school for half a year. But I never made it to the level of principal, or priciple, or what have you.
Remember what Groucho Marx said about principals - "those are my principles, and if you don't like them... I have others."
A long time ago I played with a Nikon 10.5mm on a D90. Got much the same results and had the same thoughts as Mike. If an image i took worked, well and good. If it didn't, too bad. Ultimately I decided I didn't really like that lens enough to spend AUD $550 on it, and I let it move on. Now I find I'm - missing it.
The architect in me works to perfectly (well, almost) vertical verticals. And horizontal lines stretching from end to end unbendingly. Rarely do I ever achieve this, but when I do, it's a champagne moment. And for those straight lines my Fuji 14/2.8 is for me, by far the best. A close second is my Nikon 20/2.8, a lens which oddly not many photographers like, but this is really about Fuji, so let's not wander too far off the beaten topic.
How's this for rambling on?? I could give you all lessons in rambling (or is it ramblation. I mean, after all we have ruminating and rumination.)
Mea culpa, mea culpa! I fancy myself a member of the grammar police as well, so I'm ashamed to have let this happen. I will now go read Finnegan's Wake in one sitting, as penance.
Marvelous photos as always, Mr Yokohama.
I recentlypriced one of these beaut lenses in Australia. Unlikely to buy one, as I'm unwilling to mortgage my home and sell the cats (to a cathouse) to pay for it. Aussie prices for these Fujinons are way above horrendous, that is when you can find one...