Muggins
Junk magnet
So, is this genuine, or just a nice change from cod Third Reich "Leica"s?
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Zorki-Yur...ve-Zorki-/111560964999?_trksid=p2054897.l4275
Adrian
ETA A swift Gurgle tells me that even wossisname at Fedka isn't sure!
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Zorki-Yur...ve-Zorki-/111560964999?_trksid=p2054897.l4275
Adrian
ETA A swift Gurgle tells me that even wossisname at Fedka isn't sure!
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Dear Adrian.
Faintly plausible. Lovely idea. But I have to agree: new one on me.
Cheers,
R.
Faintly plausible. Lovely idea. But I have to agree: new one on me.
Cheers,
R.
Muggins
Junk magnet
Well, no-one bit. I'd have been tempted at junk prices as it's rather pretty even with the OTT orange, and I could have used that lens, but not at that price.
Adrian
Adrian
lukitas
second hand noob
It could very well be.
They did do commemorative editions if I remember well. 50 year anniversary of Oktober, youth gamers and olympics sort of stuff.
Gagarin was so big, I wouldn't be surprised if there is a genuine one. He has a watch dedicated to him too.
They did do commemorative editions if I remember well. 50 year anniversary of Oktober, youth gamers and olympics sort of stuff.
Gagarin was so big, I wouldn't be surprised if there is a genuine one. He has a watch dedicated to him too.
newspaperguy
Well-known
I dunno... looks like a Zorki 1C to me - the old stamped body case, used before the cast one -
which would put the date of origin about 1951... ten years before Comrade G. went into space.
Just IMO.
which would put the date of origin about 1951... ten years before Comrade G. went into space.
Just IMO.
Last edited:
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
It is Zorki which was in production until 1956. He went on the orbit in 1961.
No facts what they made this series officially, but it is existing as Zorki Yura myth in Russia as well.
No facts what they made this series officially, but it is existing as Zorki Yura myth in Russia as well.
KnipsOmat
Established
I'm sure it's fake.
The camera in question does not have decorative rims along the edges of the vulcanite, and it has the old style, non-threaded shutter release. Then it has the new-style big-typeface shutter speed engravings. This places the manufacturing date in 1949 - if it is indeed a Zorki, and not a FED to start with, as I'd suspect from the shiny top of the shutter release button (a matching FED would be from the same era, however, older than 1953 with this type of shutter release).
The lens also is much more likely of FED origin. This type of aperture setting lever was replaced on Zorki's Industar-22 lenses with a ring beginning in 1949. Only few, old-style lever samples of the Industar-22 exist, and these would be highly collectible in their own right.
With all real soviet commemorative cameras, they did put normal lenses on. They did not have any commemorative cameras where the lenses were different or re-engraved with different names, let alone serial nos. from normal models - all the engravings or screen prints were on the camera bodies or in some instances even only the box was different.
Also, I'm not aware of any commemorative version of any soviet camera which does not show the camera's make or model. They all have additional engravings or print beside the normal FED or Zorki Logo. On these Jura fakes, the original factory engravings are always completely replaced.
At the time when this camera left the factory, even Sputnik-1's launch was still science fiction for years to come, leave alone Gagarin's.
I don't believe they'd have made commemorative cameras for such an important event in 1961 from stuff that had been obsolete for 12 years by then. This makes no sense.
If you look at this italian guy's Jura Zorki (scroll down), it's quite different from the one in the ebay auction:
http://corsopolaris.net/supercameras/LeicaCopy/Zorki/zorki.html
Much more modern, but also not latest version of Zorki-1, with matching lens (see focusing knob). It has at least a KMZ logo on top. The engravings are much finer, and they are not filled with red ink as with the ebay sample.
Why would they make different versions of engravings, based on differently old versions of an obsolete camera model that has been out of production for minimum 6 years at the time? No, I don't believe these are authentic.
W
The camera in question does not have decorative rims along the edges of the vulcanite, and it has the old style, non-threaded shutter release. Then it has the new-style big-typeface shutter speed engravings. This places the manufacturing date in 1949 - if it is indeed a Zorki, and not a FED to start with, as I'd suspect from the shiny top of the shutter release button (a matching FED would be from the same era, however, older than 1953 with this type of shutter release).
The lens also is much more likely of FED origin. This type of aperture setting lever was replaced on Zorki's Industar-22 lenses with a ring beginning in 1949. Only few, old-style lever samples of the Industar-22 exist, and these would be highly collectible in their own right.
With all real soviet commemorative cameras, they did put normal lenses on. They did not have any commemorative cameras where the lenses were different or re-engraved with different names, let alone serial nos. from normal models - all the engravings or screen prints were on the camera bodies or in some instances even only the box was different.
Also, I'm not aware of any commemorative version of any soviet camera which does not show the camera's make or model. They all have additional engravings or print beside the normal FED or Zorki Logo. On these Jura fakes, the original factory engravings are always completely replaced.
At the time when this camera left the factory, even Sputnik-1's launch was still science fiction for years to come, leave alone Gagarin's.
I don't believe they'd have made commemorative cameras for such an important event in 1961 from stuff that had been obsolete for 12 years by then. This makes no sense.
If you look at this italian guy's Jura Zorki (scroll down), it's quite different from the one in the ebay auction:
http://corsopolaris.net/supercameras/LeicaCopy/Zorki/zorki.html
Much more modern, but also not latest version of Zorki-1, with matching lens (see focusing knob). It has at least a KMZ logo on top. The engravings are much finer, and they are not filled with red ink as with the ebay sample.
Why would they make different versions of engravings, based on differently old versions of an obsolete camera model that has been out of production for minimum 6 years at the time? No, I don't believe these are authentic.
W
wolves3012
Veteran
As KnipsOmat says, it's unlikely to be genuine. Both body and lens look like early FED and not Zorki unless a very early one, which would surely be too valuable to butcher. There's a lot of dispute about whether any originals ever existed and there seems to be no documented evidence they did. Personally, I don't see why KMZ would have used a Zorki 1 in 1961 when their current flagship would have been a Zorki 4. I did message the seller about this camera and he did not reply, making me even more suspicious that he knows it's fake.
Muggins
Junk magnet
Funnily enough there's an ad in the current Amateur Photographer (10th Jan) for an auction company, and the images used include one of a Juri-engraved camera (though I'm not good enough to tell which from the bit shown) - real or not, there seems to be a market.
Adrian
Adrian
KnipsOmat
Established
real or not, there seems to be a market.
Of course. There are people out there actually collecting FED/Zorki based fakes.
I couldn't guarantee you I'd step away from a well made "Sibir" fake if it were cheap enough
locheeboy
locheeboy
HuubL
hunter-gatherer
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
Gagarin was so big, I wouldn't be surprised if there is a genuine one. He has a watch dedicated to him too.
That watch was a 50 years commemorative edition, made four years ago...
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.