btgc
Veteran
After watching/bidding AF-C's, I've cooled down. When I don't want'em, they go for cheap. When I want one, price skyrockets to level I don't justify. Well, I love XA2 for silent operation and compact size, that's what attracts in AF-C too. I ended up purchasing Pentax PC35AF (aka Sport 35), said to be working, comes with attachable winder. ISO goes only up to 400, later model PC35AF-M (aka Super Sport 35) with body-integrated motorwind goes to 1000 I guess, though with it one looses silent wind. After all, it's a reasonable substitute, excluding bigger size, though rest - manual (read - silent) wind, nice lens and AF - is what I wanted from AF-C. I will not tell price not to start Pentax-hunt. Well, nowadays probably not much of us are using 35mm P&S.
Just checked dimensions - AF-C without flash is listed as 105 x 67.5 x 42 (mm), PC35AF - 116 x 66.5 x 45.5 (mm). Seems that they are about same size, AF-C beeing 10mm shorter (not big deal).
Both have exactly same shutter speeds and measuring range - EV6 (F2.8, 1/8s) to EV17 (F17, 1/430s).
It's unknown how much AF-C's 6/6 lens is superior to Pentax 5/5 lens. I just assume that price diff diminishes it. Or maybe not, who knows 🙂
Just checked dimensions - AF-C without flash is listed as 105 x 67.5 x 42 (mm), PC35AF - 116 x 66.5 x 45.5 (mm). Seems that they are about same size, AF-C beeing 10mm shorter (not big deal).
Both have exactly same shutter speeds and measuring range - EV6 (F2.8, 1/8s) to EV17 (F17, 1/430s).
It's unknown how much AF-C's 6/6 lens is superior to Pentax 5/5 lens. I just assume that price diff diminishes it. Or maybe not, who knows 🙂