Getting an Hexar

A

angeloks

Well-known
Local time
3:43 PM
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
407
Location
Montreal, Canada
View My Gallery
I'm about to get a Konica Hexar. But after reading this tread, I got scared! There must be some Hexar working properly out there? Anything specific to the Hexar that I should be checking when I'll have the camera in my hands? Is it still a camera worth getting?

I played a bit with the Ikon and I didn't like it. The M6 is expensive and lacks some features key of the Hexar (AE, easy loading, x0.60 finder, etc...). What do you guys think?
 
Last edited:
I have been using Hexars RF for several years now and never had a problem. I take mine on trips and they work out just fine. i think its a fine camera. Like anything - it can break. Reason you hear about it - there are a lot less hexar Rf users (and hexar cameras) compared to leica, so when it happens, it's immediately posted online. Yet , if you read carefully, many people have a lot more issues with Leicas, Hassy's, etc. - new and used - thats why all those mandatory cLAs, etc. i used to have Leica M3 and m6 and still have M5 - and while fine cameras - I had more problems with them, vs hexars. I only had one problem with one of my 3 hexars - had to adjust RF alignment, which I did myself and its been fine. Just scan and see how many people had issues with M8, M7 and MP and had to send them back leica. And those are far more expensive and new cameras!
I think if you have a chance to run a roll through the camera and it works fine - odds are you have a good camera. Of course - you never know, but thats the thing about any camera. It's just its harder to find a good service for a Hexar anymore. Is it a risk worth taking? For me it was and it worked out well so far.
 
Buying anything with old and obsolete electronics carries some risk. You don't repair a circuit board. You replace it. No spares, no replacement.
 
It's a great camera, wonderful ergos and the motordrive is hoot. I think it's still worth getting. I bought mine new about four years ago. It was brand spanking new in the plush box, w/lens, flash, etc. I've been very happy with it.

In my quest to get one, I bought one off of FLEABAY about 4 1/2 years ago and it didn't work. Very frustrating, because there really isn't much you can do about it. The HRF is an battery-dependent camera. Dead battery? Dead camera.

I haven't been looking, but I think you can still find NOS offerings.

/
 
If you're more a shooter than a fondler, I suggest reconsidering the Zeiss Ikon.

I was not impressed the first time I held one either. Took another 18 months before I finally bought one.

Now I have two and have no regrets whatsoever. Really easy camera to use, and the finder is brilliant!
 
35mmdelux said:
My experience was a great disappointment. The camera has many nice features but lacks the industrial built of a Leica. The shutter dial is whimpy.
Click to expand...

Really? Hmmm. I dont think so. But than again, I dont use mine to hammer nails in either. My Hexars been on the travels to many countries and under different conditions. Never a problem. Plus it's body is made from titanium, if I'm not mistaken. I think it's a very sturdy camera. The only drawback - it does depend on batteries (so does ZI), but if you remeber to turn it off - batteries will last a very long time. Plus, unlike Leicas - no worries about burning holes in your shutters or using a fast lens wide open during the day as it's shutter goes to 1/4000sec. So, to me - it works out much better than most other choices.
 
Yes, the Hexar RF can die. But a Leica can need a 300 dollar repair, you can lose a Voigtlander, someone can steal a Zeiss Ikon.

If mine dies, I'll get another one... or just use another rangefinder and carry on shooting with the lenses I have. I'd be pissed off - it's a really fine camera - but it wouldn't be the end of the world.

Like Krosya, any worries about potential failure are outweighed by the advantages (for me, 1/4000, AE when I want it, shutter that doesn't burn in the sun, LED display).

My digital camera was more expensive than my Hexar. If that dies after manufacturer support has ended, that will be an unrepairable, unsellable paperweight too - but it didn't stop me buying it.

Get the camera that you like and that makes you want to go out and shoot - though I sense you know this already.
 
I had one and used it to (almost) death. A very tough camera, the tops are titanium. The only thing I never liked about it was the VF/RF. If you wear progressive lenses it is very hard to get the patches to line up horizontally and I could never see the speeds on the left edge of the VF.

However I hung on to it until I got the M7. I do miss the built in motor drive.
 
I used one of mine a few days ago on a theater project. Really, I can't think too hard about using anything else.

bonniePBT.jpg

Bonnie, Playback Theater, December 19, 2009

(Technical: Hexar RF, 50 f/2 M-Hexanon, Ilford XP-2 Super)


- Barrett
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
My search...
2
Replies
35
Views
1K
Darthfeeble
Darthfeeble
P
Which camera for 28 and 50mm?
3 4 5
Replies
95
Views
7K
Beemermark
Beemermark
G
Were the Konica I Type Ab and As limited to just 4000 units?
Replies
8
Views
2K
GrantW
G
J
35mm Still-Picture Photography: It began with scale focusing cameras! Back To Basics. Part 1, From the first to half-frame 35s of then and now.
Replies
10
Views
1K
Jason Schneider
J
Hayli
Beginner needing help finding a camera with certain specifications
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Bolo Kukus
B
Back
Top Bottom