Good Jupiter lens repairman?

Jamie Pillers

Jamie Pillers

Skeptic
Local time
11:48 AM
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
4,266
I just purchased a Jupiter-9 lens. Aperture ring moves smoothly and easily, but the focusing ring is stiff. Can anyone here tell me of a good repairman that's familiar with these lenses? Preferably located in Northern California, but if not, then elsewhere.

On a related matter, I haven't yet tested the lens yet. Do I need to look out for potential focusing problems on this lens like the ones I read about regarding the Jupiter-12 (where they sometimes need shims replaced/adjusted)?

Thanks for any advice.

Jamie
 
any difference known between J-9 LTM and M42 versions ? am just thinking to buy one and use with with EOS adapter :)
 
Yuri's repairman at Fedka works on the J9 but will not charge little money, as he has to repair problematic J9s that were most likely screwed up on someone's kitchen table.
the J 9 is the more troublesome FSU lens, seconded by the Jupiter 3.
the LTM version of these lenses have a known history of problems before they are sorted out.

the J 12 is not known to need shimming much.
DOF covers a lot of errors in a 35mm lens.
 
jarski said:
any difference known between J-9 LTM and M42 versions ? am just thinking to buy one and use with with EOS adapter :)
Click to expand...

I have both versions.

the M42 J 9 is a great trouble free lens with none of the focus problems of the LTM J 9, as you are focusing the M42 J 9 through the lens on a focusing screen on an SLR camera.
 
Jarski,

From my understanding, the M42 is derived from the LTM lens so it would be likely to have similar issues. The Contax mount version, OTOH, because it's what Zeiss originally designed, is almost always in good working order if the glass hasn't been abused.

I have heard that the Helios 40-2 is a better bet for the m42 portrait lens, for what it's worth. See here: http://www.xs4all.nl/~tomtiger/russcam/helios40.html

William

PS - good point about focusing on the ground glass. So whichever one is easier to come by for you might well be better.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
William,
Thanks for the information. I'm going to contact both Eddie S. and Yuri B. to see what they say. I'll report back on this thread when everything gets resolved. :)
Jamie
 
Every J-9 I have ever handled seems to have been assembled with cheap bearing grease, which has dried to a nondescript substance with the consistency of a mix of wax, taffy and amber (including the one I'm sending you, William :D).

I never got around to trying the DIY re-lube, but I found another good set of instructions here: http://www3.telus.net/public/rpnchbck/Jupiter-9 dismantle.html
 
wlewisiii said:
From my understanding, the M42 is derived from the LTM lens so it would be likely to have similar issues. The Contax mount version, OTOH, because it's what Zeiss originally designed, is almost always in good working order if the glass hasn't been abused.
Click to expand...

Well actually the LTM version is derived from the Contax lens, too, it's just more complex mechanically. The Contax rangefinder works by inferring distance from rotation, so all you need mechanically is a spring to keep the lens at the correct distance. That's why all rangefinder-coupled Contax lenses that attach to the outer bayonet cover the same rotational angle for the same focusing distance. For the Leica-type rangefinder, though, the lens needs to translate the outward movement of the lens barrel to a different movement of the rangefinder cam. Therefore the LTM version needs a double helix, which has a tendency to gum up. The M42 version doesn't need that because there is no rangefinder, and focusing is less critical on an SLR lens anyway because you get focus confirmation through the lens. That's why it's the LTM lens that is "evil", and the other versions are considerably simpler.

I had a J-9 generously fixed by Kim Coxon for me, which has been focussing flawlessly; the problem is rather my own eyes, and the fact that at f/2 and 85mm focusing is difficult with any lens. You're in Noctilux territory there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom