Sparxter
Member
I just bought a really old camera case from a guy that was just looking to get rid of it. In it was a really used old leica, the vulcanite was missing on most of the camera and was very brittle on the rest. It has a 5cm f2 lens and I was really excited to use it as a user.
I was pretty excited to use this camera and see what the lens is capable of, so I cleaned it up a bit unstuck the aperature ring, and loaded in an old roll of film and started playing without a light meter and hardly a clue as this is the first rangefinder to shoot with.
So here's my problem. I love old cameras and history. I have a shelf ranging from Kodak 110 to this circa 1942 leica. Must are worth almost nothing but... Here is my problem, it looks like this leica is a luftwaffen. Also in the old camera suitcase, there are two stereo kodaks about the same vintage. On the front of the leica and one of the kodaks is a plastic label maker label that says DAY-25. I'm trying to figure this out. I bought the suitcase some months ago and haven't gotten around to playing with these until just now and can't remember the guys name I bought it from. So I can't quiz him about his grandfather.
I've been doing a little digging and I know that the allies used stereo cams for recon, and two of them in the same box with the mysterious day-25 leads me to believe they may have been used for that purpose.
If anyone knows anything about wwII Kodak stereo recon cameras, and or can look up the serial on the sumitar 5cm f2 lens that would help me greatly to decider my mystery. The day 25 label on these cameras is killing me. I really need to get back to work and stop scouring the Internet for clues.
The lens is not engraved with the luftwaffen, but the serial no is: 585798
Thanks for help with this mystery. This day 25 thing is killing me. I'm imagining this guy doing recon with these cameras in the war then coming home and using them to take vacation photos with them. There are some stereo slides of Alaska vacation and regular classic boat photos taken with his family in 1969.
For all I know this guy could have done the recon that thwarted the v1 and v2 programs. In which case I really should not use this camera anymore.
I was pretty excited to use this camera and see what the lens is capable of, so I cleaned it up a bit unstuck the aperature ring, and loaded in an old roll of film and started playing without a light meter and hardly a clue as this is the first rangefinder to shoot with.
So here's my problem. I love old cameras and history. I have a shelf ranging from Kodak 110 to this circa 1942 leica. Must are worth almost nothing but... Here is my problem, it looks like this leica is a luftwaffen. Also in the old camera suitcase, there are two stereo kodaks about the same vintage. On the front of the leica and one of the kodaks is a plastic label maker label that says DAY-25. I'm trying to figure this out. I bought the suitcase some months ago and haven't gotten around to playing with these until just now and can't remember the guys name I bought it from. So I can't quiz him about his grandfather.
I've been doing a little digging and I know that the allies used stereo cams for recon, and two of them in the same box with the mysterious day-25 leads me to believe they may have been used for that purpose.
If anyone knows anything about wwII Kodak stereo recon cameras, and or can look up the serial on the sumitar 5cm f2 lens that would help me greatly to decider my mystery. The day 25 label on these cameras is killing me. I really need to get back to work and stop scouring the Internet for clues.
The lens is not engraved with the luftwaffen, but the serial no is: 585798
Thanks for help with this mystery. This day 25 thing is killing me. I'm imagining this guy doing recon with these cameras in the war then coming home and using them to take vacation photos with them. There are some stereo slides of Alaska vacation and regular classic boat photos taken with his family in 1969.
For all I know this guy could have done the recon that thwarted the v1 and v2 programs. In which case I really should not use this camera anymore.