Got a Nikon F - now what lenses?

The great thing about nikon lenses is they 'mostly' all work with all the bodies, so why limit yourself to lenses of that period. I'd also look for these:

85/1.8
50 or 55/1.2
105/2.5
24/2.8

heres a couple with the 24/2.8 (if wide is your thing)
5066062065_3455485d33_b.jpg


4848820887_e0eef7e2ef_b.jpg


Todd
 
I think it must be the Nikkor-S Auto 1:1.4 f=5.8cm

Second that. And the first version 105/2.5, the Sonnar design. I own both on two Nikkormats and they are great.

I'm considering the Voigtlander 58/1.4 for male portraits and will use the Nikkor 58/1.4 for female portraits then.

The Nikkor 58/1.4 sometimes suddenly has Noctilux-like character. Still trying to control that but as I'm switching the lens back and forth between film and APS-C, I'm struggling.
 
So what is the difference between the S series lenses and the H series?

The older Nikkors had a code that designated the number of lens elements, based on prefixes that corresponded to the first letters of the Latin word for the number (not sure how accurate to Latin these really are). H denotes 6 elements; S denotes 7; O denotes 8.

The oldest version of the 50/2 had seven elements, so Nikkor-S is what's on the lens. These are relatively rare, and I understand not as good optically as the six element Nikkor-H.

U = 1
B = 2
T = 3
Q = 4
P = 5
H = 6
S = 7
O = 8
N = 9
D = 10
UD = 11
 
the 85 f2 is a gem. IMHO better than the later 1.8. you can find them for $250.

The bezt standard prime is the 50 1.4, although the 1.8 is great too.

the 35 2.8 is underrated and cheap.
 
Made me go and look to see what I actually had.

Nikkor f2/85
Nikkor f2/20
The others are early 'originals' which have solid (non-perforated) ears.
Nikor H Auto f2/50
Micro-Nikkor Auto f3.5/55
Nikkor O.C Auto f2/35
Nikkor Q Auto f3.5/135
Nikkor Q Auto f4/200

To the OP - definitely suggest a 2/50, the 2/85 and a wide - maybe the 35/2 or a 28/2.
 
+1 for the Nikkor-H AUTO 1:3.5 f=2.8cm (or f=28mm)

It is Tale 12 from "NIKKOR - The Thousand and One Nights". I have a factory AIed version that I use on a F3HP and really like it. The Nikon walk-in service center in Shinjuku (Tokyo) cleaned and re-greased the helicoid, got to love the service.

Casey
 
the 85 f2 is a gem. IMHO better than the later 1.8. you can find them for $250.

The bezt standard prime is the 50 1.4, although the 1.8 is great too.

the 35 2.8 is underrated and cheap.

I especially like the 85/2 AIS due to its very compact size and low weight. Low contrast wide open (good for portraits). By f/5.6 it's scalpel-sharp.

I have had a couple of Nikkor 50/1.4's (and currently have one on my Nikkormat), but I actually like the f/1.8 lenses (especially the Series E) better.
 
Legendary Nikon lenses (pre AI) include 24f2.8, 55f3.5 Micro, 85f1.8, and 105f2.5. Lots of pj's covered lots of news during the Vietnam era with Leica M with a couple wides and a Nikon F with 105/200.

Currently have a mint F with 24/55/105/200 which I have not used in a couple years. Am thinking about selling so PM me if interested.
 
Affordable, it's not. You probably could buy three Nikon Fs for the cost of one of theses.

And it's not one of the "classic" (i.e. pre-AI vintage) Nikkors. Only the 85/1.8 is pre-AI. But you're right, it's one of the top Nikkors by general acclamation.
 
This is somewhat duplication of what's already been said but if you want a good 3 lens kit using 60s lenses, consider the 24/2.8, the 50/1.4 and the 105/2.5.

If you want a few more lenses, you could add some from the 20/3.5UD, 28/3.5, 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2.8 and 180/2.8.

To make them look right on your F make sure you get pre AI lenses with scalloped focus rings. None of those modern fangled rubberised grips.
 
Out of nostalgia, last summer I was looking into building an F kit. As I recall from a summer of watching eBay, the least expensive pre-AI, pre-multi-coating lenses at that time were the 28/3.5, 35/2.8 and 50/2 at about $50 each. The 24/2.8 would show up once in a while for about $100. The 35/2 and 85/1.8 seemed to go for more like $150. The 180/2.8 is AMAZING and worth checking out, but I wasn't pricing those at the time. (All this just from memory. Also, I was looking for good glass but just user cosmetics.)

Personally, I'd go 35/2 + 85/1.8 up front and keep an eye open for the 24/2.8 and 180/2.8, down the road.

A 28/50/105 kit is another good way to go. Some people just can't live without a 50, and the 105 is superb. But if you have a fast 35 and a fast 85, you don't need a fast 50 and can slot a 55/3.5 Micro Nikkor in there. The 55, of course, is another legendary Nikkor.

Footnote on the 85s: The 85/1.8 is a big hunk of glass, and heavy. There were two later 85/2 models that were much lighter. The first one had slower focusing (requiring more turning of the lens barrel) and the second one had rather quick focusing (much less turning). I've used them all extensively. Leaving price out of it, I'd say the one to own is the second 85/2. It's the smallest and lightest and quickest to focus. But the 1.8 is a complete classic and I'd pick it over the first 85/2.
 
I've used F's for 40 years now and it's fun to read what lenses folks like. I've used many of them.

Many have mentioned the 55 f3.5 Micro Nikkor. Is it better or different, aside from speed, from the 55 f2.8 version?

Just curious. Thanks. Joe
 
24/2.8 50/1.4 105/2.5 200/4.0 (all Ais) & 50/2.0 H-C is what I have... They all work well with my Nikon F (FM & F3HP) but I can`t focus them correctly anymore due to my eye-sight .. 😱
 
I know what you mean

I know what you mean

the microprism/matte/fresnal focusing for me is pretty useless, but the center split image is what I use. It does require some kind of known straight lines and for my screens, is only in the very center of view.

Also, need about 2.8 or faster, or it can get dim, unlike an RF.

But... no frickin' focus shift :angel:

24/2.8 50/1.4 105/2.5 200/4.0 (all Ais) & 50/2.0 H-C is what I have... They all work well with my Nikon F (FM & F3HP) but I can`t focus them correctly anymore due to my eye-sight .. 😱
 
Back
Top Bottom