Great XA's great grand-daughter...

Juan Valdenebro

Truth is beauty
Local time
8:16 PM
Joined
May 23, 2009
Messages
4,352
Location
Barcelona and Colombia
When I use the XA, I feel it's great for direct sun: as I know an absolute setting of aperture and speed for a given film, let's say Tri-X, I just set it at a small aperture and exposures are fine most of the time, at near 1/250, and I get what I really want: I prefocus it at 8 feet and get huge depth of field, so I never focus but just look and shoot. Very easy and very fast. No one takes the camera seriously in public. No sound. Great. Not as perfect or as controlled as bigger equipment, but certainly a lot lighter and smaller than AE SLR's and AE RF's... The lens is good enough for me at f/8 and f/11.

But for shadows, overcast, or a bit lower light levels, the XA doesn't shine that much for doing the same, because of its limited ISO 800, a film speed that doesn't allow me to shoot at fast speeds and small apertures unless I'm under direct sun... So for a few months I've been shooting 3200 film with my RF's and my SLR's for the same relaxing, prefocusing and huge depth of field style when I feel like going that way in overcast days...


Some days ago I started a couple of threads asking for help to decide which small camera similar to XA could be used to pair with it so I could be ready for sun and shadows anytime, even in places where showing off bigger or better cameras is not the most recommendable idea... Whenever any of those options started to give me the possibility of deciding aperture manually, those cameras started to grow in size, and their price started to become close to that of real RF's, so I couldn't find a real XA for 3200 film that made sense...


The problem (my problem) with best lenses' point-and-shoots without manual aperture, is that to freeze action they tend to use on their AE the widest apertures: precisely what I don't want... Then last night I thought: a way for me to get enough depth of field, even on widest apertures, is finding a slow lens camera with slow enough widest aperture so it's able to use 3200 film... I started to check brands and read some reviews from photographers, and clearly was Olympus the company that made the most successful cameras in that style: lots of models, and millions sold for decades, and all came from the same mother: the XA...


Here I checked all the models:


http://www.camerapedia.org/wiki/Olympus_mju_Stylus_Epic#Flagship_Metal_model


I looked for a model with the slowest lens possible for depth of field, and I tried to choose a relatively new model, because that way the camera could be found, in general, in the best possible shape... Finally I went for the Olympus Stylus Wide 100, with a 28-100 lens: one of the last models made, just a few years old... It was made a decade after the Olympus Stylus Epic shown on Stephen Gandy's article on compact cameras, and more than two decades after the classic XA...


I'm pretty sure its lens will be more than good enough stopped down, as my 3200 film will be setting “manually” a small aperture for enough sharpness and depth of field for me, because its top speed is just 1/640. Aperture closes to f/18... Perfect for controlling TMZ's high sensitivity...


So this is the end of the story: I found my low light XA. There was only one on ebay, a mint one, so I hurried up and ordered it a moment ago... I think I was lucky to find a recent model, and precisely the latest of the only two models they made with a 28mm zoom... The price was just the same I paid for my XA: $50 + shipping.


The Oly XA & Tri-X for sun, and the Oly Wide 100 & TMZ for shadows, will make a powerful team for prefocused ultralight shooting, just anywhere anytime.


Cheers,


Juan
 
Older cameras don't go up to ISO 3200, I guess, because that were (and is) specialist speed. Most of people didn't care about such films, and they were and are expensive - remember, we are talking about cameras for a masses, not a few enthusiasts.

While AF compacts have their strenghts (not limited to AF only), they have also downsides. First to mention, hmmmmm, is AF. It as possible to prefocus using AF compact, though it is nowhere as easy and fast as with MF camera.

If we get back to XA, then I have superior rival for it (well, it doesn't have RF which is a plus) - Yashica 35 MC. It is as small as XA (heavier, I admit, and little lens protrudes out of body, but not terribly) and has REAL aperture control. That and scale focus makes it ultimate street camera. Downside is lack of dedicated EV1.5+- dial, you will have to use ISO lever to adjust for backlit and tricky scenes. In ISO range department AF compacts beat it as max ISO value is 1000, but it works for me.
 
All the Olympus AF cameras I used have a shutter lag that is way longer than the XA´s. The second issue I found are heavy distortions of these zoom lenses. I wish you luck with the Wide 100, but the only Oly AF I still use is the mju-II (Stylus epic).
 
Why not the Olympus Stylus Epic Mju II?

It has the 35mm f/2.8 lens which is similar to the XA's focal length and aperture..

http://www.jimtardio.com/olympus-epic.html
http://reviews.davidleetong.com/?p=782

Because, as explained on the OP, that camera tends to use it's lens wide open, and I want the lens stopped down always... That's why I looked for a lens as slow as possible: even wide open, with a slow lens I can have more depth of field than with a 2.8 one. Then, if AF fails, it's no problem...

Cheers,

Juan
 
Older cameras don't go up to ISO 3200, I guess, because that were (and is) specialist speed. Most of people didn't care about such films, and they were and are expensive - remember, we are talking about cameras for a masses, not a few enthusiasts.

While AF compacts have their strenghts (not limited to AF only), they have also downsides. First to mention, hmmmmm, is AF. It as possible to prefocus using AF compact, though it is nowhere as easy and fast as with MF camera.

If we get back to XA, then I have superior rival for it (well, it doesn't have RF which is a plus) - Yashica 35 MC. It is as small as XA (heavier, I admit, and little lens protrudes out of body, but not terribly) and has REAL aperture control. That and scale focus makes it ultimate street camera. Downside is lack of dedicated EV1.5+- dial, you will have to use ISO lever to adjust for backlit and tricky scenes. In ISO range department AF compacts beat it as max ISO value is 1000, but it works for me.

Well, with its rangefinder, the XA can be precisely focused if necessary wide open...

Cheers,

Juan
 
All the Olympus AF cameras I used have a shutter lag that is way longer than the XA´s. The second issue I found are heavy distortions of these zoom lenses. I wish you luck with the Wide 100, but the only Oly AF I still use is the mju-II (Stylus epic).

Yes, I'll have some distortion, and just a bit of shutter lag, but almost nothing... (Not at all close to compact digital cameras' shutter lag...) But what that camera and type of shooting can offer me, can be of higher value...

I'll post some images as soon as I start using it... I'm just curious to check its results on wet prints, but I'd bet its images could be just as good as any other brand or camera... Time will tell...

Cheers,

Juan
 
Well, with its rangefinder, the XA can be precisely focused if necessary wide open...

In situations you mentioned personally I very rarely focus otherwise than by scale, both because of speed and not to attract attention.

For shots asking for exact focus there are other cameras, I fully agree to you.
 
Today the camera came. I tested everything... Works perfectly and looks like it was never used... Maybe a digital point-and-shoot replaced it for the previous owner as this one was made just a few years ago...


It's small: just a little bit bigger than my XA, but in the same small pocket style. Weighs a bit less than my XA. Not bad for a 28-100 zoom with two aspherical lenses... Being a slow zoom lens, I guess they made a relatively corrected and decent zoom... Soon I'll know... I just loaded the camera with what will be its usual food: TMZ, and tomorrow I'll go out for the first time with it for shadows, interiors or overcast, with my XA in other pocket, set, prefocused and ready for direct sun with Tri-X.


I liked the Oly Wide 100 very much: it has a several points autofocus system that works very well, prepared for not being fooled if two subjects/objects are separated: the camera checks the frame sides too, and focuses the foreground instead of focusing the background as most small AF cameras do.... There's nice and easy exposure/focus lock by depressing the shutter half way, and then I can decide framing... And great: with a simple button, you set on/off the spot metering mode, which has a real narrow view and also halfway shutter exposure/focus lock for complex lighting, back lighting, etc., and for less common composition/focus/subject placement situations... A very capable and fast tool indeed... And with another button I can rewind anytime, without completing the roll: that's useful too... Frame advance is quiet: my electronic Nikon SLR's are a lot louder... Just like the XA, I open it and it's ready to shoot right the next second even before I have it in my eye... And what I liked the most: the camera has a real quick response... I hit the shutter and it fires immediately. It's almost like a mechanical body: the sensation is that it has a very fast autofocus and no shutter lag: just the same as my AF Nikon SLR's...


Not bad for $49.


In a few days I'll be back with some sample images to show what the lens can do...


Cheers,


Juan
 
As no one's mentioned it I'll say that the Olympus XA3 can take from 25 to 1600 ASA/ISO film.

The trouble is it's not a CRF but three position zone focusing like the XA2 and is (roughly) a DX version of the XA2.

I don't find the zone focusing a problem and the camera is not as vulnerable to knocks as the XA.

Aside; looking at the specification in the instruction book, it says LR44's or SR44's...

Regards, David
 
Back
Top Bottom