BillBingham2
Registered User
The L to me is the classic CV Bessa. Low cost, high value, super functional.
B2 (;->
B2 (;->
David Murphy
Veteran
Write-in candidate
Write-in candidate
Write-in candidate: Bessaflex TM
Write-in candidate
Write-in candidate: Bessaflex TM
traveler_101
American abroad
The R4 has opened a better than 2:1 lead over the R. I knew that there would be a lot of votes for the R4 because it is a unique camera, but I must say i am little surprised at the way the numbers look at this point.
And where are all the doubters? The guys who don't like Cosina . . . Nice and polite this forum.
And where are all the doubters? The guys who don't like Cosina . . . Nice and polite this forum.
SamShio
hiking/walking photog
I love my Olive R2 and the R4M I have is great with wider lenses. They make a great pair when I am out.
Out to Lunch
Ventor
Missing from the list are the CV Bessa III and III Wide.
Missing from the list are the CV Bessa III and III Wide.
This poll is in the "Voigtlander Bessa Leica Mount Cameras" section of RFF.
robert blu
quiet photographer
Rick Waldroup
Well-known
I voted for the T.
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
How many Bessas?
How many Bessas?
In order to contrast enthusiast (this poll) vs consumer (actual buyer) preference
it would be very interesting to see production and/or sales figures by CV model.
Care to enlighten us, Mr. Gandy?
Chris
How many Bessas?
In order to contrast enthusiast (this poll) vs consumer (actual buyer) preference
it would be very interesting to see production and/or sales figures by CV model.
Care to enlighten us, Mr. Gandy?
Chris
Bingley
Veteran
As a "classic," I voted for the Bessa R, even though I no longer own one. I think it played a major role in reviving interest in rangefinder cameras and was the first modern rangefinder for LTM lenses.
I can also make the case for the Bessa T (which I still have), the perfect and unique Barnack with Mod Cons.
Personally, I think the Bessa R2A (or *M) is an incredible value for the money.
I can also make the case for the Bessa T (which I still have), the perfect and unique Barnack with Mod Cons.
Personally, I think the Bessa R2A (or *M) is an incredible value for the money.
aizan
Veteran
the zeiss ikon or gf670!
maggieo
More Deadly
Zeiss Ikon.
Robert Lai
Well-known
I have the Bessa R, and the GFIIIW.
Really excellent viewfinders, and nice meter readout.
The metering is accurate too.
The 55mm lens on the GFIIIW is outstanding.
Really excellent viewfinders, and nice meter readout.
The metering is accurate too.
The 55mm lens on the GFIIIW is outstanding.
kchan
Member
I have the Bessa R, but I really haven't taken more than a couple of rolls with it .. so for me ... the Epson Rd-1 
Peter_S
Peter_S
Bessa III (667) and 667W
Darthfeeble
But you can call me Steve
I didn't vote because the only one I know first hand is the R. I don't see too many of them being around and working in 30 years. I liked mine, very light and compact but like others, I don't see the build quality there to make it a "classic".
Pioneer
Veteran
My R2C is still ticking fine. Doesn't get the heavy use that my ZI or MA get but it should last for awhile.
I think that anyone is expecting Nikon F or Leica M3 toughness from these cameras but under "normal" use (3 to 6 rolls per month) they should last for awhile.
I actually think that long term repair is a serious question but, unless there is a fault in a part, or it is abused, it should hang in there quite well. Believe me, I have some really questionable sheet metal stamped cameras from the 50s that I wouldn't have bet on back then either, but they continue to work.
I think that anyone is expecting Nikon F or Leica M3 toughness from these cameras but under "normal" use (3 to 6 rolls per month) they should last for awhile.
I actually think that long term repair is a serious question but, unless there is a fault in a part, or it is abused, it should hang in there quite well. Believe me, I have some really questionable sheet metal stamped cameras from the 50s that I wouldn't have bet on back then either, but they continue to work.
jmilkins
Digited User
I owe a lot to Mr K. and his wonderful team.
The L started me on this mad but happy path. The R3a's got me hooked on 40s. The T is a joy because it is different. And my R4a's have that extraordinary finder. My Bessa III and ZI are a step above.
Overall, I voted R4 because in 30 years I think the unique finder will stand the test of time as a desirable "classic", but I feel the R really got the renaissance rolling.
Thank you to Mr K, Jorge, Stephen, Tom A and all the many others who have championed RFs and Cosina Voigtlander in particular.
The L started me on this mad but happy path. The R3a's got me hooked on 40s. The T is a joy because it is different. And my R4a's have that extraordinary finder. My Bessa III and ZI are a step above.
Overall, I voted R4 because in 30 years I think the unique finder will stand the test of time as a desirable "classic", but I feel the R really got the renaissance rolling.
Thank you to Mr K, Jorge, Stephen, Tom A and all the many others who have championed RFs and Cosina Voigtlander in particular.
Ronald M
Veteran
None will ever be classic. Consumer grade stuff, all of it.
radi(c)al_cam
Well-known
R2... it's nice, but doesn't offer anything that a Leica hadn't (that I'm aware of).
You mean then? I guess: the shutter speeds, e.g.?
Pretty camera in that color though.
Wish I would have an olive R2!
But I'm happy having a black one
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.