dazedgonebye
Veteran
Besides the obvious differences in FL, are there any significant differences in the image quality that can be expected from these three camera lines?
I have a GS and, with only 1 roll through it, think it's a very handy camera. I wouldn't mind if it were a bit wider, so the GX looks attractive. The GX is also a good deal smaller, which fits what I think my use of a rangefinder would be. Then there's the CC...wider still.
Three excellent cameras and the decision comes down to prefered FL?
I have a GS and, with only 1 roll through it, think it's a very handy camera. I wouldn't mind if it were a bit wider, so the GX looks attractive. The GX is also a good deal smaller, which fits what I think my use of a rangefinder would be. Then there's the CC...wider still.
Three excellent cameras and the decision comes down to prefered FL?
wkjagt
Member
I will have the CC this week, I will let you know how it 'feels in my hands'.
Antonio Shalder
RF-Brasil
Hi! I have a CC and a GTN. Both are very capable. For me, I prefer the GTN because it has more manual overrides than the CC, like the flash position (1/30s) and the B setting. The GTN has also compensed parallax marks in the viewfinder. The ones in the CC are fixed. I had a GX, but my impression is the GT/GS series are far better.
But the CC lens is wider and also very sharp. It´s smaller and lighter too.
In terms of sharpness and exposition, both cameras are fine.
But the CC lens is wider and also very sharp. It´s smaller and lighter too.
In terms of sharpness and exposition, both cameras are fine.