randomm
Well-known
Help me decide.
I have a severe case of GW690 gas. What I have been more recently looking for is a reliable medium format camera that is portable and also hopefully fully manual, or if not at least very robust. I have a Rolleiflex 2.8E and a Moskva-5 which fit the bill to a point, and the Moskva seems to be my walk around MF camera at the moment as I dare not take the Rollei into the snow and hail with me.
There's nothing much wrong with my Moskva. The RF is pretty much aligned (there's 2cm error at closest focus distance between the lens scale and the RF, have not checked with ground glass yet), speeds are sound and seem healthy judging from results etc. The biggest problem with it is that its a bit slow to use (although pre-setting shutter, aperture etc does enable it to be a street shooter of sorts). If only it had a combined RF / VF window, ah...
I would love to be able to get a Makina 67 or a Fuji GF670, but both are out of my price range at the moment. Also, I have read worrying things about them both (battery depletion with the Fuji and stability of the struts and serviceability of the Makina), but that's pretty much beside the point as I can't currently afford either.
I've been looking at the (optical) quality of photographs taken with the GW690 on flickr and have been blown away by it. On my short list I have also had the Certo Six, Balda Super Baldax and the Iskra 1. First two seem to be pretty rare and at least Jurgen or Certo6 fame suggests that all Certo Sixes need their prisms re-silvered, which is putting me off, especially as I live in Europe and would rather not ship anything to the US for service.
So, a quick & fun poll for the day!
Edit: noticed a typo in poll options, sorry! Don't know how to edit those.
I have a severe case of GW690 gas. What I have been more recently looking for is a reliable medium format camera that is portable and also hopefully fully manual, or if not at least very robust. I have a Rolleiflex 2.8E and a Moskva-5 which fit the bill to a point, and the Moskva seems to be my walk around MF camera at the moment as I dare not take the Rollei into the snow and hail with me.
There's nothing much wrong with my Moskva. The RF is pretty much aligned (there's 2cm error at closest focus distance between the lens scale and the RF, have not checked with ground glass yet), speeds are sound and seem healthy judging from results etc. The biggest problem with it is that its a bit slow to use (although pre-setting shutter, aperture etc does enable it to be a street shooter of sorts). If only it had a combined RF / VF window, ah...
I would love to be able to get a Makina 67 or a Fuji GF670, but both are out of my price range at the moment. Also, I have read worrying things about them both (battery depletion with the Fuji and stability of the struts and serviceability of the Makina), but that's pretty much beside the point as I can't currently afford either.
I've been looking at the (optical) quality of photographs taken with the GW690 on flickr and have been blown away by it. On my short list I have also had the Certo Six, Balda Super Baldax and the Iskra 1. First two seem to be pretty rare and at least Jurgen or Certo6 fame suggests that all Certo Sixes need their prisms re-silvered, which is putting me off, especially as I live in Europe and would rather not ship anything to the US for service.
So, a quick & fun poll for the day!
Edit: noticed a typo in poll options, sorry! Don't know how to edit those.
PMCC
Late adopter.
GW690 is a worthy camera with good glass, but portability is not its strongest suit. It also is odd man out among your other choices, as it is 6x9 whilst your other wants are 6x6 and 6x7 (save the Moskva-5 you already have). But get the GW690 (or 670) if you're jonesing for one, why not? They're cheap as chips and built like Russian tanks -- neither fine nor elegant, but big, loud and well nigh unstoppable. The others on your list are cranky antiques by comparison, with all the charms implied thereby.
randomm
Well-known
Thanks for your opinion. Yeah, the format is not the same. I'm mostly a 3/2 or 4/3 aspect ratio kinda guy, but for portability's sake I've been willing to entertain the idea of a 6x7 camera, the GW670 just isn't at all smaller or lighter, so thus may as well get the real deal. Also, seems that the prices for the 690 models are lower than for the more rare 670 or 680 models.
Folders are nice. My Moskva folds into my winter coat's pocket nicely, but at the end of the day it does not feel particularly robust. The GW690 looks very large from what I've seen, which I'm not 100% sure how I feel about.
Have I missed anything obvious, from the list I mean? Flipping mirror is a no-no, leaf shutter much preferred. Do not like the vertical composition of the Bronica RF645, and also the negative is too small for my liking (and my slightly archaic flatbed scanner, I only have a dedicated film scanner for 135 film).
ChrisN
Striving
Perhaps a GSW690 - the wide FOV gives you a (cropped) panorama option, and as they say, you can (sometimes) zoom with your feet!
Maiku
Maiku
The Fuji 690 is an amazing camera. No battery required. Great glass. The down side is the size, but remarkably it is pretty light weight. It is big, but no more cumbersome than a Nikon F5 with a zoom lens. Why not try one? If it doesn`t suit you then sell it. People are always looking for one.
jbielikowski
Jan Bielikowski
you know, its big... really big. I was about to buy but this photo made me think twice: http://www.flickr.com/photos/blueone33/4067962830/
NLewis
Established
I would not call the GW690 a "portable" camera. It is more portable than a Pentax 67 or a Mamiya RZ67, but it is still a big item. I wouldn't compare it to 6x7 folders like the GF670. It is more like a Mamiya 7 with a fixed lens. The GW690 is easily handholdable, while 6x7 SLR designs are only barely handholdable, for example picking it up off the table for some quick shots in the studio. The GW690 is also quieter than MF SLRs, since you don't have that crashing mirror or focal-plane shutter. Like any 6x7, the lenses are slow, and DOF is shallow. Remember, f/8 on 35mm has the same DOF as f/16 on 6x7 or 6x9. So, if you want deep DOF, you are probably going to need a tripod, especially since it is somewhat silly to shoot MF and then blow it with camera shake. Depending on your standards in these matters, you might want to shoot one stop faster when handheld than you would with 35mm, in other words, at the literal focal length -- around 1/125th using the 90mm lens of the GW690.
I have a GW690. Despite its similarity to a Leica M camera, you don't really use it the same way. You only get eight shots per roll, which tends to rule out a lot of "candid" shooting unless you are willing to go through a lot of film. I use it more for landscape-y or cityscape-y situations and posed people shots -- as you would use a Mamiya 7 for example.
If you want a walkaround MF camera, I'd just use your Rolleiflex. Very nice camera. If you still have GW690 lust, then just get one and try it out. Maybe it will be just your thing.
I have a GW690. Despite its similarity to a Leica M camera, you don't really use it the same way. You only get eight shots per roll, which tends to rule out a lot of "candid" shooting unless you are willing to go through a lot of film. I use it more for landscape-y or cityscape-y situations and posed people shots -- as you would use a Mamiya 7 for example.
If you want a walkaround MF camera, I'd just use your Rolleiflex. Very nice camera. If you still have GW690 lust, then just get one and try it out. Maybe it will be just your thing.
randomm
Well-known
Yeah, saw that earlier. It does look big, but at the end of the day it cannot be that much bigger than my Moskva-5 folded out. Hopefully slightly easier to focus, and luckily I have big hands.
ruby.monkey
Veteran
Can't imagine why anyone in his right mind would want one of these behemoths. 
KenR
Well-known
I have a GSW690 that I brought to a NYC meetup a month ago. Great lens but a kind of slow at f/5.6. Definately heavy, but I took mine hiking in California last year and only had my wife carry it on the way home a couple of times. Changing the film every 8 exposures is more of a limit now that there is no more 220 B&W.
Matus
Well-known
Reminds me of this comparison from flickr:
Bronica RF645 vs Contax 645:
One of the reasons I finally got Mamiya 6 instead of Contax 645 (which I would still love to get - that 80/2 lens is amazing ... ).
PMCC
Late adopter.
Ditto, portability not a big selling point, especially for use as a daily walk around camera, absent services of a sherpa/wife. As to number of shots, the 6x7 version does get 10 exposures, worth considering if the format/focal length combo isn't a show stopper.
Now that I think about it, I'm wondering why OP doesn't just use his Rollei 2.8E, with a suitably protective bag to protect from the elements. A much easier carry. No camera on OP's list would be a good candidate for shooting in actual rain and hail -- all would need to be stowed safely away during filthy weather. Otherwise, Rolleis are as robust as anything mentioned, i.e., neither made of sugar nor storm-proof. Few MF cameras are.
Chris Bail
Regular Guy
The picture flickr picture referenced is one of mine (You'll also see it as my avatar here)...It's definitely bigger than my Moskva 5, but not as heavy, maybe... It was nice to use, but I like the GS645 a bit better. Sold the 690 and kept the 645 and Moskva 5.
I'd do a size comparison for you, but I sold it in November...it wasn't getting used enough to justify keeping it.
Landshark
Well-known
With regards to the photo referenced, It's a shortish lens for the format and shot at a pretty lose distance, I think there's some exaggeration of the cameras size
Chris Bail
Regular Guy
Perhaps...It was shot at the absolute minumum focus distance in the mirror...I had to sway to and fro to get it focused.
ruby.monkey
Veteran
What that photo doesn't show is how easy it is to carry these 645 SLRs on a shoulder strap - they hang down vertically, stay well out of the way, and are eminently portable.Reminds me of this comparison from flickr:
Bronica RF645 vs Contax 645:
One of the reasons I finally got Mamiya 6 instead of Contax 645 (which I would still love to get - that 80/2 lens is amazing ... ).
Get the Contax.
slungu
Established
Well, having a Agfa Record for 6x9 I liked the size of the neg, the aspect ratio but wanted something with a coupled rangefinder, so I just got myself a GW690 that arrived yesterday. It is big and it is 1.3kg, and mine is not in such a great shape cosmetically, but I hope it will do the job. So the advice would be : go for it ( or the gsw690 if you want wider, but then other options like the chinese panoramic ones could come into play, since focusing should be less important )
Arvay
Obscurant
Just get it. I can't stop admiring its quality-of-image/simplicity/price ratio (I've got II mod))
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
Right. And it shows that we are bad at estimating volume if the items to compare are not aligned along the same (long) edge. In real, the Bronica is close to 2/3 of a M645pro (which should be the same size as the Contax) with f/2.8 lens. The f/2 lens is no fair comparison by the way - the Bronica does not even have f/2.8, and it makes up for almost half the weight and size of that Contax combination...
noah b
Established
The 690 and 670 fuji rangefinders are great cameras, but takes some getting used to lugging around that big plastic box. I love the fact you can stop down to f/32 so you can compete with 4x5 cameras. I've owned all three models of the 690 and the III version is by far the best. Currently I'm using the GW670II and I love it. Only wish they would've put the 65mm lens on it. Has anyone had experience with the fuji 645 cameras? I'm thinking about investing in one for nighttime portraits.