jett
Well-known
I have a Rolleiflex. Well, I have several 🙂 but I use all of mine at the waist/chest. However, I also want a 120 camera to use at eye-level, for portraits. I want a higher vantage point at times but I still want to use the camera fluidly without tripods and stools. I really enjoy both perspectives.
The way I see it, I have 3 options. I want to stay 6x6 and I'm not interested in RF's because of close-focus limitations.
1. Get a Rollei prism: The pros of this is that I have a camera that I'm already used to (ergonomically atleast) and the con of this is that I am limited to one focal length. Well, this isn't so straightforward because I have a T and I would opt for a 3.5E2/E3 because I prefer the other Rolleiflex ergonomics more. But i would try out the prism with the T first.
2. Get a Hasselblad & prism(s). Well there are a few reasons why I'd want a Hasselblad, like to have lenses that are wider and longer, but if I were to stick with a standard lens, then is this camera any "better". I don't care about the optical differences but more of the usability at eye-level. I view the Hasselblad as more of a tripod camera.
3. Stick with 35mm, go 645, go mamiya 6. In otherwords, make a compromise.
Any thoughts?
How does the Rolleiflex + Rollei prism compare with the Hasselblad + 90 prism? In terms of brightness, focusing, ergonomics, etc. Assuming stock and maxwell screens.
The way I see it, I have 3 options. I want to stay 6x6 and I'm not interested in RF's because of close-focus limitations.
1. Get a Rollei prism: The pros of this is that I have a camera that I'm already used to (ergonomically atleast) and the con of this is that I am limited to one focal length. Well, this isn't so straightforward because I have a T and I would opt for a 3.5E2/E3 because I prefer the other Rolleiflex ergonomics more. But i would try out the prism with the T first.
2. Get a Hasselblad & prism(s). Well there are a few reasons why I'd want a Hasselblad, like to have lenses that are wider and longer, but if I were to stick with a standard lens, then is this camera any "better". I don't care about the optical differences but more of the usability at eye-level. I view the Hasselblad as more of a tripod camera.
3. Stick with 35mm, go 645, go mamiya 6. In otherwords, make a compromise.
Any thoughts?
How does the Rolleiflex + Rollei prism compare with the Hasselblad + 90 prism? In terms of brightness, focusing, ergonomics, etc. Assuming stock and maxwell screens.