shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
Sweet!!
This weekend I'm hoping to shoot with a Zeiss 135/2.8 for my Contax body. I've been looking for that sucker for a looong time 😛
Hopefully it'll arrive tomorrow in the mail.
Good light to ya, Ted!
Has Leica made the right choice not joining the m43 ranks?
- Thread starter rover
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 62
- Views 1K
Sweet!!
This weekend I'm hoping to shoot with a Zeiss 135/2.8 for my Contax body. I've been looking for that sucker for a looong time 😛
Hopefully it'll arrive tomorrow in the mail.
Good light to ya, Ted!
Dwig
Well-known
Voted "yes" by rewording the question to refer to camera bodies only.
Yes, I think not rebranding Panasonic bodies is a good idea
Yes, I think concentrating on their own M-series digitals is a good idea
Yes, I think exploring new possibilities with the X-1 is a good idea
but also
I think supporting the m4/3r line with Leica lenses, even if manufactured by Panasonic, it also a good idea. Lenses like the DG Macro-Elmarit 45mm f/2.8 ASPH are what Leica should be doing in m4/3. There's every reason to make Leica lenses available in any mount where there is a good market for them.
Yes, I think not rebranding Panasonic bodies is a good idea
Yes, I think concentrating on their own M-series digitals is a good idea
Yes, I think exploring new possibilities with the X-1 is a good idea
but also
I think supporting the m4/3r line with Leica lenses, even if manufactured by Panasonic, it also a good idea. Lenses like the DG Macro-Elmarit 45mm f/2.8 ASPH are what Leica should be doing in m4/3. There's every reason to make Leica lenses available in any mount where there is a good market for them.
Roma
Well-known
I don't like the 4:3 as much as 3:2. I think they should've started with the censor like they did for X1 and CMOS. It's still possible to make good and small mirror-less cameras with cropped 3:2 CMOS.
Similar threads
