ishpop
tall person
Specificaly, the Hasselblad Planar T, and the Rolleiflex 2.8 TLR (Not the 6006). I realize these are different camera categories, but I would say these two camera/lens combos produce my favorite square format photos while scanning other people's work.
What is the primary difference in the design of these lenses?
I now own the Planar T, and I am very much enjoying my results.
I also own a much older rolleiflex with the Opton Tessar, which is very nice also, but definitely different.
However, I've seen many Rollei 2.8 photos that I really dug, and maybe they seemed "creamier" than the Planar T.
I realise this could all be a figment of my imagination, and that "creamy" is a subjective description.
Any thoughts?
What is the primary difference in the design of these lenses?
I now own the Planar T, and I am very much enjoying my results.
I also own a much older rolleiflex with the Opton Tessar, which is very nice also, but definitely different.
However, I've seen many Rollei 2.8 photos that I really dug, and maybe they seemed "creamier" than the Planar T.
I realise this could all be a figment of my imagination, and that "creamy" is a subjective description.
Any thoughts?
Last edited: