The problem to me is that, in the SLR world, there really hasn't been much more manufacturers can do in the way of "new and improved": take a look at the last cameras each company came out with (Contax with the RTS III, AX and RX; Minolta with the Maxxum 9; Pentax with the MZ-S; Olympus with the OM3/4Ti; and, of course, the still-current Nikon F6 and Canon EOS 1v. If anything, I've long felt there's been too much useless technological churn over the last decade, even before the digital tidal wave hit.
In the RF world, things move more slowly, of course, but stuff did happen: technologically, the three cameras that kicked the bar higher, IMO, were (in no particular order), Hasselblad's XPan, Contax' G series (yeah, I know, "it's not really an RF, but I digress), and my beloved Konica Hexar RF. The Bessas are notable for getting more people into the RF world without their wallets trembling at the sound of the L word, and that's a noteworthy achievement on its own.
So, I really don't think we're going to see any more really new film-based cameras from here on out, although a really nice pocketable 35 might still find a viable market, though sadly nothing along the lines of my Contax Tvs. Between the bumper-crop of used cameras and the shrunken film market overall, I'm hoping more for stability and sustainability than shiny new stuff. (I did my buy-new-shiny-stuff part in 2002, big time.)
Edit: Just wanted to qualify the above graf: we'll probably see refinements of current-production cameras. In the meantime, just be happy you can pick up the phone and order yourself a new F6, 1v, ZI, MP/M7, or all sorts of Bessas. Is it really all that bad?
- Barrett